Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 19:24 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 19:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
SobhanR
Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Last visit: 23 Nov 2012
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
2
 [2]
Posts: 1
Kudos: 2
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
811,087
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,087
 [3]
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,810
Own Kudos:
2,091
 [2]
Given Kudos: 679
Posts: 1,810
Kudos: 2,091
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
sahuayush
Joined: 02 Apr 2020
Last visit: 19 Feb 2026
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 270
Posts: 18
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For this question, why can the solution not be found using 2C1* 9C4 [1 out of President or VP attending and 4 from amongst the remaining 9 managers]

Bunuel chetan2u
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sahuayush
For this question, why can the solution not be found using 2C1* 9C4 [1 out of President or VP attending and 4 from amongst the remaining 9 managers]

Bunuel chetan2u

Hi

You are missing out on the teams that do not contain both the president and the Vice President.
So add 9C5 or 126 to it.

Answer = 2C1*9C4+9C5=2*126+126=252+126=378
avatar
sahuayush
Joined: 02 Apr 2020
Last visit: 19 Feb 2026
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 270
Posts: 18
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u Oh, thank you!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Fdambro294
Joined: 10 Jul 2019
Last visit: 20 Aug 2025
Posts: 1,331
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,656
Posts: 1,331
Kudos: 772
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Generally with these types of Questions that give a Restriction that "2 People can NOT be together" on a team or group, it is better to Find the Total No. of Ways to Choose with NO RESTRICTION ---- and then SUBTRACT out the No. of Ways to Form the Group VIOLATING the RESTRICTION (in which the 2 People are actually together)


For Instance, All the Completely Exhaustive Ways of Making a Team of 5 out of 11 People are the following:



Total No. of Ways to make a Team of 5 out of 11 =

(No. of Ways where P + VP TOGETHER)

+

(No. of Ways P on Team, VP NOT on Team)

+

(No. of Ways VP on team, P NOT on Team)

+

(No. of Ways NEITHER VP nor P on team)



The question says that we want to find the No. of Ways in which P and VP are "NOT TOGETHER" --- this includes the LAST 3 that are ADDED in the List Above.

Rather than Finding all the Different Ways for Each of those LAST 3 Scenarios, it's easier to just SUBTRACT Over the (No. of Ways where P and VP ARE TOGETHER) from the Total Possible Ways when there is NO Restriction.

This will give us the Answer for those LAST 3 Scenarios without having to do as much Calculation.



(Total No. of Ways NO RESTRICTION) - (No. of Ways where P and VP TOGETHER)

= All the Ways in which we can have a team where P and VP are SEPARATED



1st) Total No. of Ways NO RESTRICTION

11 Distinct people in Available Pool
Can Select Any 5

"11 choose 5" = 462 Ways to create a Team of ANY 5 People


-Subtract-


2nd) No. of Ways in which P + VP are TOGETHER (Violating Constraint)

We 1st "Fix" P and VP Together on every different possible Team of 5 --- this has 2 Effects:

-a- We now only have to Select 3 People since every team will have P + VP on it

-b- The Available "Pool" of people from which we can select is reduced by -2 ---- 9 People Remain


"9 Choose 3" = 84 Ways to create a Team with P + VP always Selected Together


462 - 84 = 378


Answer: 378 Ways to choose a Team of 5 where P and VP are SEPERATED
User avatar
tetraneha
Joined: 28 Apr 2020
Last visit: 24 Nov 2022
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 124
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V34
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V34
Posts: 24
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I tried approaching the question like this:
No of ways to fill
the first place: 11, second place: 9 (excluded 1 member, they cannot be on the same team)
3rd 4th and 5th place: 8*7*6
Therefore, the no of ways become: (11*9*8*7*6)/ 5!
5! is the no of repeats that will be present if these people are arranged among themselves.
I did not get an integer value for this.
Bunuel chetan2u could you explain what is wrong in this method?
Moderators:
Math Expert
109818 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts