sydqur kishorpalletiIt's because this combination leaves significant room for overcounting.
The core problem is that this method treats the selection of the initial 5 books (4 Antiquity, 1 Post-modernism) and the final 2 books as two separate, independent steps. However, the identity of the final group of 7 books is what matters, not the order or steps in which they were chosen.
The correct way to solve problems with "at least" conditions is to partition the total possibilities into a series of mutually exclusive (non-overlapping) cases. Each case represents a unique final composition of the 7 books that satisfies the constraints.
The possible compositions are defined by the number of Antiquity books (A) and Post-modernism books (P) selected, where A+P=7, A≥4, and P≥1.
Case 1: 4 Antiquity and 3 Post-modernism.
Number of ways: C(7,4)×C(7,3)=35×35=1225
Case 2: 5 Antiquity and 2 Post-modernism.
Number of ways: C(7,5)×C(7,2)=21×21=441
Case 3: 6 Antiquity and 1 Post-modernism.
Number of ways: C(7,6)×C(7,1)=7×7=49
By using this method, each unique final group of 7 books (e.g., a specific set of 5 Antiquity and 2 Post-modernism books) is calculated only once within its specific case. Summing the results of these distinct cases gives you the correct total number of ways:
1225+441+49=1715