robinbjoern
I get your point but I think the question is flawed because in essence the events are not dependent. Ronaldo could also score 500 goals if the other teams scores 1 more Ronaldos Team would loose. Also another Team member other than Ronaldo could lead the team to a win. How are we supposed to know that those events are dependent?
Hi,
I got your point and it is really a little the meaning regarding what the question is asking is subtle.
Actually, what you said makes sense: the team can win, having Ronald marked >= 3 goals or <3. Or even vice versa, rigth?
I agree with you.
They are indepedent if you think about one of them independently, as the other doesn't exist.
But, what would you say if you were asked "what are the odds of Ronald marks three or more goals and the team wins?"In this case, you've changed the scenario, you have a new scenario. The scenarios (goals of Ronald and team win) now are coexisting and can have intersections!
For the sake of illustration, we can have now the following outcomes:
Ronald scores 3 or more goals AND Team wins
Ronald scores 3 or more goals AND Team loses
Ronald scores less than 3 goals AND Team wins
Ronald scores less than 3 goals AND Team loses
Well, what I mean by this is that in a given scenario when we have two or more events (let's say A, B, C,...), they are called Dependent Events when they have intersection (not empty, of course) with each other. And when they don't have any intersection, they are called independent.