Imagine a season of 100 matches total.
In 73 matches, the team wins.
In 59 matches, Ronaldo scores 3 goals.
Now, think about what "neither event happens" means: the team loses AND Ronaldo does not score 3 goals.
Because the team wins in 73 matches, there are only 27 matches left where the team loses (100 - 73 = 27). In those 73 winning matches, "neither happens" is already impossible because the team won. Therefore, the absolute maximum number of matches where neither event happens is 27 out of 100 (0.27).
This maximum occurs if all 59 of Ronaldo's scoring games happen inside the 73 winning games.
Explaining the Options One by One
Option A (0.1107)
What it calculates: 0.41 times 0.27 = 0.1107.
Why it is wrong: This assumes the two events are like flipping two completely unrelated coins (independent). In real life and probability bounds, Ronaldo scoring goals helps his team win. Multiplying gives the probability for independent events, not the greatest possible probability.
Option B (0.27)
What it calculates: 1 - 0.73 = 0.27 (or 27 out of 100 matches).
Why it is correct: Since 73 matches are wins, at most 27 matches are available where a win did not happen. If Ronaldo also failed to score in those same 27 matches, you get the maximum possible value for neither event occurring.
Option C (0.41)
What it calculates: 1 - 0.59 = 0.41 (the chance Ronaldo does not score 3 goals).
Why it is wrong: This completely forgets about the team winning. It only tells you how often Ronaldo fails to score 3 goals, ignoring whether his team won those matches.
Option D (0.5693)
What it calculates: 1 - (0.59 times 0.73) = 0.5693.
Why it is wrong: This calculates the chance that at least one event fails to happen if they were independent. It answers the wrong question entirely.
Option E (0.62)
What it calculates: A random distractor number.
Why it is wrong: It is mathematically impossible because the team already wins in 73% of matches, leaving only 27% where neither could possibly occur.