Hi yukisuki,You're actually right that
in general two numbers with decimals can add up to a whole number:
0.3 +
0.7 =
1.0 is a fine example. So it's a smart thing to double-check. The key is that here we're
not hoping the decimals happen to line up - the algebra
forces the sum to be an integer.
Look back at the step you're reacting to (Graeme's expansion). When you add the two cubes:
- (x + 3√y)3 contains "messy" cube-root terms,
- (x - 3√y)3 contains the
same terms with opposite signs.
When you add them, those irrational pieces
cancel exactly, and what survives is built only from the integers x and y (Graeme wrote it as
2x3 + 18xy2). Any expression made purely by adding and multiplying integers
must be a whole number - its decimal part is
0, guaranteed, not by luck.
So the two expressions aren't two random decimals that happen to complement each other. They are
conjugates, and the structure of the subtraction/addition is what pins them together.
That's exactly why the final step works: if a is the decimal part of the small cube and b is the decimal part of the big cube, then a + b is an integer, and since both sit in [
0,
1), the only value it can be is
1.
Hence a =
1 - b, giving
D.
Quick parallel to feel the "forced" cancellation:- Compute (
5 + √
2) + (
5 - √
2).
The √
2 and -√
2 cancel, leaving exactly
10 - a whole number
every time, no coincidence required. Conjugate pairs always kill the irrational part. That's the same machinery running in this question.
Answer: Dyukisuki
KarishmaBHi, how can we be sure the LHS has zero decimal portion, can't it be a.3 + b.7 = c.0 for example??