Hi ischiragkapoor,The confusing part is exactly where Andrew's post first
derives b =
3/4 and then, one line later, says b
cannot equal
3/4. That looks like a contradiction, but the two lines are answering two different questions.
What matching coefficients actually gives youWhen Andrew set 4x + 3 = ax + ab and forced both sides to mirror each other (
a = 4 and
b = 3/4), he was building the case where the two sides are
identical. Identical sides means
every x works - that's
infinitely many solutions, not zero. So b =
3/4 is the value that would give you infinite solutions, which is precisely what the question does
not want.
Split it into two clean stepsMove everything to one side:
- 4x + 3 = ax + ab → (4 - a)x = ab - 3
Now read the coefficient of x:
-
If a ≠ 4, then (4 - a) isn't zero, so you can divide and get one clean value of x. That's a solution - not allowed. So
a must be 4. (Statement I.)
-
With a = 4, the x-term vanishes and you're left with 0 = 4b - 3, a plain number statement.
That last line decides everything:
- If 4b - 3 =
0 (i.e.
b = 3/4): you get 0 = 0, true for all x -
infinite solutions.
- If 4b - 3 ≠
0 (i.e.
b ≠ 3/4): you get something like 0 =
5, false for every x -
no solution.
Since we need
no solution, b must avoid
3/4. That's Statement III.
A quick feel for it- 2x + 3 = 2x + 5 - subtract 2x: 3 =
5, false -
no solution.
- 2x + 3 = 2x + 3 - subtract 2x:
3 =
3, true -
infinite solutions.
Same skeleton: once the x's cancel, a
false leftover means no solution, a
true leftover means infinitely many. That's why a =
4and b ≠
3/4 - answer
C.
Answer: Cischiragkapoor
hr1212 bbCan someone explain why no solution means a=4 but b not equal to 3/4