Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 10:28 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 10:28
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
MilindJ
Joined: 09 Sep 2012
Last visit: 07 Mar 2013
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
14
 [8]
Given Kudos: 22
Location: United States
Posts: 17
Kudos: 14
 [8]
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shreerajp99
Joined: 06 Jun 2010
Last visit: 07 Dec 2013
Posts: 143
Own Kudos:
49
 [2]
Given Kudos: 151
Posts: 143
Kudos: 49
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Pansi
Joined: 04 Jul 2011
Last visit: 01 Dec 2019
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
329
 [2]
Given Kudos: 87
Status:Fighting hard
GMAT Date: 10-01-2012
Posts: 42
Kudos: 329
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,782
Own Kudos:
810,823
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,782
Kudos: 810,823
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
When an international relief agency extended loans to 28 countries, the unemployment rate dropped in some of the countries, and the per-capita GDP rose in some of the countries. In how many of the countries did the unemployment rate drop?

Given that {total}={unemployment rate dropped}+{GDP rose}-{both}+{neither} --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+{GDP rose}-{both}+{neither}.

Question: {unemployment rate dropped}=?

(1) In 10 of the countries, the unemployment rate did not drop, and the per-capita GDP did not rise. {neither}=10 --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+{GDP rose}-{both}+10. Not sufficient.

(2) In 12 of the countries, the per-capita GDP rose but the unemployment rate did not drop --> {GDP rose}-{both}=12 --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+12+{neither}. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) 28={unemployment rate dropped}+12+10 --> {unemployment rate dropped}=6. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
PathFinder007
Joined: 10 Mar 2014
Last visit: 21 Oct 2018
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 127
Kudos: 745
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
When an international relief agency extended loans to 28 countries, the unemployment rate dropped in some of the countries, and the per-capita GDP rose in some of the countries. In how many of the countries did the unemployment rate drop?

Given that {total}={unemployment rate dropped}+{GDP rose}-{both}+{neither} --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+{GDP rose}-{both}+{neither}.

Question: {unemployment rate dropped}=?

(1) In 10 of the countries, the unemployment rate did not drop, and the per-capita GDP did not rise. {neither}=10 --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+{GDP rose}-{both}+10. Not sufficient.

(2) In 12 of the countries, the per-capita GDP rose but the unemployment rate did not drop --> {GDP rose}-{both}=12 --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+12+{neither}. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) 28={unemployment rate dropped}+12+10 --> {unemployment rate dropped}=6. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

Hey Bunuel,

could you please explain me following statement

In 12 of the countries, the per-capita GDP rose but the unemployment rate did not drop --> {GDP rose}-{both}=12 --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+12+{neither}. Not sufficient.

I want to know why we are considering {both} here.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,782
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,782
Kudos: 810,823
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
PathFinder007
Bunuel
When an international relief agency extended loans to 28 countries, the unemployment rate dropped in some of the countries, and the per-capita GDP rose in some of the countries. In how many of the countries did the unemployment rate drop?

Given that {total}={unemployment rate dropped}+{GDP rose}-{both}+{neither} --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+{GDP rose}-{both}+{neither}.

Question: {unemployment rate dropped}=?

(1) In 10 of the countries, the unemployment rate did not drop, and the per-capita GDP did not rise. {neither}=10 --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+{GDP rose}-{both}+10. Not sufficient.

(2) In 12 of the countries, the per-capita GDP rose but the unemployment rate did not drop --> {GDP rose}-{both}=12 --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+12+{neither}. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) 28={unemployment rate dropped}+12+10 --> {unemployment rate dropped}=6. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Hope it's clear.

Hey Bunuel,

could you please explain me following statement

In 12 of the countries, the per-capita GDP rose but the unemployment rate did not drop --> {GDP rose}-{both}=12 --> 28={unemployment rate dropped}+12+{neither}. Not sufficient.

I want to know why we are considering {both} here.

{GDP rose} includes ALL the countries where GDP rose, so the countries where GDP rose and unemployment rate dropped as well the countries where GDP rose and unemployment rate did not drop:
{GDP rose} = {GDP rose and unemployment rate dropped} + {Only GDP rose} = {Both} + {Only GDP rose}

So, the number of countries where GDP rose but the unemployment rate did not drop = the total number of countries where GDP rose minus those countries where GDP rose and unemployment rate dropped:
{Only GDP rose} = {GDP rose} - {Both} --> 12 = {GDP rose}-{both}.

Hope its clear.
User avatar
hideyoshi
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Last visit: 05 Dec 2020
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 18
Affiliations: Scrum Alliance
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V38
WE:Information Technology (Retail: E-commerce)
GMAT 2: 710 Q48 V38
Posts: 72
Kudos: 183
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Using the table method, one can come to conclusion that both the statements are needed to arrive at an answer.

Table attached...
Attachments

screenshot.png
screenshot.png [ 25.05 KiB | Viewed 3862 times ]

User avatar
sarahfiqbal
Joined: 06 Jan 2015
Last visit: 16 Aug 2021
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,103
Status:Studying for GMAT
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 20
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question (once you know how to tackle it) its easy. When I first read it, I thought it was a mean/median type question and suddenly just freaked out because I had no idea what to do. So I guessed and fair enough got it wrong. Looking at the explanations, it is just a simple double matrix question. Took me 28 secs to do the question once I realised this. I am wondering why I didn't think of double matrix in the first place? I feel like my thinking process isn't right. How to fix this? Do you just attempt more practice problems?

I am a little frustrated with myself because of that. =_= :( :? :cry:
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,965
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,965
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109782 posts
498 posts
212 posts