Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 08:58 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 08:58
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Marcab
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Last visit: 22 Jan 2021
Posts: 840
Own Kudos:
4,944
 [35]
Given Kudos: 221
Status:Retaking after 7 years
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.75
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 840
Kudos: 4,944
 [35]
Kudos
Add Kudos
35
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,837
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,896
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,837
Kudos: 811,398
 [25]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
BangOn
Joined: 27 Feb 2012
Last visit: 22 Mar 2019
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
193
 [3]
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 94
Kudos: 193
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sambam
Joined: 18 Oct 2011
Last visit: 09 Jan 2014
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Marketing
GMAT Date: 01-30-2013
GPA: 3.3
Posts: 58
Kudos: 429
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If x is an integer, can the number (5/28)(3.02)(90%)(x) be represented by a finite number of non-zero
decimal digits?

(1) x is greater than 100
(2) x is divisible by 21
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,837
Own Kudos:
811,398
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,896
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,837
Kudos: 811,398
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sambam
If x is an integer, can the number (5/28)(3.02)(90%)(x) be represented by a finite number of non-zero
decimal digits?

(1) x is greater than 100
(2) x is divisible by 21

Merging similar topics. Please refer to the solutions above.

Also, please read carefully and follow: rules-for-posting-please-read-this-before-posting-133935.html Pay attention to the rule #3: the name of a topic (subject field) MUST be the first 40 characters (~the first two sentences) of the question.
avatar
WarriorGmat
Joined: 09 May 2013
Last visit: 13 Dec 2013
Posts: 35
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 35
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
THEORY:

Reduced fraction \(\frac{a}{b}\) (meaning that fraction is already reduced to its lowest term) can be expressed as terminating decimal if and only \(b\) (denominator) is of the form \(2^n5^m\), where \(m\) and \(n\) are non-negative integers. For example: \(\frac{7}{250}\) is a terminating decimal \(0.028\), as \(250\) (denominator) equals to \(2*5^3\). Fraction \(\frac{3}{30}\) is also a terminating decimal, as \(\frac{3}{30}=\frac{1}{10}\) and denominator \(10=2*5\).

Note that if denominator already has only 2-s and/or 5-s then it doesn't matter whether the fraction is reduced or not.

For example \(\frac{x}{2^n5^m}\), (where x, n and m are integers) will always be terminating decimal.

(We need reducing in case when we have the prime in denominator other then 2 or 5 to see whether it could be reduced. For example fraction \(\frac{6}{15}\) has 3 as prime in denominator and we need to know if it can be reduced.)

Questions testing this concept:
does-the-decimal-equivalent-of-p-q-where-p-and-q-are-89566.html
any-decimal-that-has-only-a-finite-number-of-nonzero-digits-101964.html
if-a-b-c-d-and-e-are-integers-and-p-2-a3-b-and-q-2-c3-d5-e-is-p-q-a-terminating-decimal-125789.html
700-question-94641.html
is-r-s2-is-a-terminating-decimal-91360.html
pl-explain-89566.html
which-of-the-following-fractions-88937.html
if-r-and-s-are-positive-integers-141000.html

BACK TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION:

If x is an integer, can the number (5/28)(3.02)(90%)(x) be represented by a finite number of non-zero decimal digits?

First of all \(\frac{5}{28}*3.02*\frac{9}{10}*x=\frac{5*302*9*x}{28*100*10}=\frac{5*302*9*x}{7*(4*100*10)}=\frac{5*302*9*x}{7*(2^2*2^2*5^2*2*5)}\). Now, according to the theory above, in order this number to be termination decimal, 7 must be reduced by a factor of x (no other number in the numerator has 7 as a factor and all other numbers in the denominator have only 2's and 5's), so it'll be a terminating decimal if x is a multiple of 7.

(1) x is greater than 100. Not sufficient.
(2) x is divisible by 21. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Hope it's clear.

"Brilliant Bunuel"
avatar
shilpabhagwat
Joined: 25 Nov 2014
Last visit: 02 Aug 2015
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What happens if x has many 000s in the end so that there is no decimal left e.g. if x= 21000000 - there will no finite number of non-zero decimals. I think (b) is also not sufficient. Please help!!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 26 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,837
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,896
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,837
Kudos: 811,398
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shilpabhagwat
What happens if x has many 000s in the end so that there is no decimal left e.g. if x= 21000000 - there will no finite number of non-zero decimals. I think (b) is also not sufficient. Please help!!

It's VERY easy to test that. Plug x = 21,000,000 and see what you get.
avatar
dqi2016
Joined: 27 Mar 2015
Last visit: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Marcab
If x is an integer, can the number (5/28)(3.02)(90%)(x) be represented by a finite number of non-zero decimal digits?

(1) x is greater than 100
(2) x is divisible by 21

Source: Jamboree

So when the question says CAN the number be a terminating decimal, it's actually asking is it ALWAYS a terminating decimal?

Posted from GMAT ToolKit
User avatar
Harley1980
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 997
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 997
Kudos: 6,769
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dqi2016
Marcab
If x is an integer, can the number (5/28)(3.02)(90%)(x) be represented by a finite number of non-zero decimal digits?

(1) x is greater than 100
(2) x is divisible by 21

Source: Jamboree

So when the question says CAN the number be a terminating decimal, it's actually asking is it ALWAYS a terminating decimal?

Posted from GMAT ToolKit

Hello dqi.
It can't be always or not always it's or can be represent or cannot be represent.
If X doesn't contain 7 than this number can't be represent as terminate decimal. (always)
If X contain 7 than this number can be represent as terminate decimal. (always)
avatar
dqi2016
Joined: 27 Mar 2015
Last visit: 09 Mar 2018
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
But according to statement 1, if x>100, then if x is 280, that number would be a terminating decimal. But if x=101, then it's non terminating. So technically, abusing by statement 1, x "can" be a number to make it terminating, but isn't necessarily?
User avatar
Harley1980
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 997
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 997
Kudos: 6,769
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dqi2016
But according to statement 1, if x>100, then if x is 280, that number would be a terminating decimal. But if x=101, then it's non terminating. So technically, abusing by statement 1, x "can" be a number to make it terminating, but isn't necessarily?

I think now I correctly understand your first question about "always"
Yes we should find statement (or both statements) that give us condition when X always make this number terminating. If statement give us variants - this is wrong statement.

In this task in second statement X always make this number terminating. And in first statement sometimes yes (x =280) - this number will be terminating and sometimes no (x = 101).
This is general rule for any DS task. We should find condition (or combination) which always will give us needed result without any execeptions.
User avatar
Divyadisha
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Oct 2014
Last visit: 01 Jun 2018
Posts: 660
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.98
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 660
Kudos: 1,958
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Marcab
If x is an integer, can the number (5/28)(3.02)(90%)(x) be represented by a finite number of non-zero decimal digits?

(1) x is greater than 100
(2) x is divisible by 21

Source: Jamboree

A number can be represented as infinite decimal if the denominator is in the form 2^n 5^m

Looking at the expression, (5/28)(3.02)(90%)(x), we are fine with all numbers except 28 as it is a multiple of 7. If any statement can tell us that either the expression gets rid of this 7 or it doesn't, we can conclude if the expression is terminating or not. (Basically look for statement that tells us if x is or not a multiple of 7)

(1) x is greater than 100. x may or may not be multiple of 7. Not sufficient
(2) x is divisible by 21. That means x is a factor of 7; and hence it will leave 4 as the decimal. we will get a terminating decimal. Sufficient

B is the answer
User avatar
Salsanousi
Joined: 19 Oct 2013
Last visit: 29 Dec 2020
Posts: 391
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 117
Location: Kuwait
GPA: 3.2
WE:Engineering (Real Estate)
Posts: 391
Kudos: 358
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Marcab
If x is an integer, can the number (5/28)(3.02)(90%)(x) be represented by a finite number of non-zero decimal digits?

(1) x is greater than 100
(2) x is divisible by 21

Source: Jamboree

\(\frac{5}{28} * \frac{302}{100} * \frac{90}{100} * x\)

for this to be a terminating decimal the denominator must be in the form of \(\frac{x}{2^a * 5^b}\)

Re-writing the question stem numbers to be \(\frac{5}{7*2^2} * \frac{302}{2^2 * 5^2} * \frac{90}{2^2 * 2^5} * x\)

from statement 1) if we x > 100 it might include a multiple of 7 and it might not. so insufficient.

2) x is divisible by 21, meaning it could be 21,42,63 etc.. it is a multiple of 21 and 21 = 7 * 3

This will cancel the 7 in the denominator and will lead to the terminating decimal form, sufficient.

Answer choice B
User avatar
energetics
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Last visit: 09 Oct 2020
Posts: 294
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 325
Posts: 294
Kudos: 973
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
\(\frac{5}{28} *\frac{302}{100} * \frac{90}{100} * x\)

\(\frac{x*5*2*151*9*10}{2^{4}* 7 * 10^{4}}\)

\(\frac{x * 9 * 151}{2^{4} * 7 * 10^{2}}\)

Reworded Question: is x=7 or a multiple of 7?

(1) x is greater than 100
if x = 700 then YES
if x = 101 then NO
Insufficient.

(2) x is divisible by 21
If x is divisible by 21, then it's divisible by 7.
Sufficient.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,988
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,988
Kudos: 1,118
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109837 posts
498 posts
212 posts