torontoclub15
Hi Bunuel,
I understand why B is sufficient (as you have clearly shown) but I always thought that you need at least three equations to solve a system of equation with three variables involved (a, b, and c in this case). But it seems that we only needed two equations in this case (the one in QS and (2)) to solve for c. So does the rule about needing three equations for three variables not always hold?
Let me try to answer your question.
You are correct to say that you need 'n' equations to solve for 'n' variables, but sometimes you might be able to solve for a particular variable by manipulating the given equations (when the number of equations < number of variables).
Example, Lets say the questions asks to find the value of 'a' and you are given the following equations:
a+b+c=100
200+b=a-c
On the first glance, you will mark that the statements are not sufficient as number of equations (=2) < number of variables (=3) but look carefully,
a+b+c=100...(1)
200+b = a-c ---> a-b-c=200....(2), adding equations (1) and (2) you get,
a=300 and hence the statements are sufficient.
Thus, in a DS question, you need to be absolutely sure that given a system of linear equations, you will not be able to eliminate n-1 variables in order to mark E. Otherwise, you will end up marking anything but E (i.e. you will be able to eliminate n-1 variables!).
Hope this helps.
Excellent. Thanks for clearing that up. I had been blindly following that rule for DS questions without any further work.