Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 12:21 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 12:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rohankant12
Joined: 27 May 2013
Last visit: 12 Oct 2018
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
86
 [4]
Given Kudos: 12
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 8
Kudos: 86
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,050
 [4]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,050
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ENGRTOMBA2018
Joined: 20 Mar 2014
Last visit: 01 Dec 2021
Posts: 2,319
Own Kudos:
3,890
 [1]
Given Kudos: 816
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.7
WE:Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V44
Posts: 2,319
Kudos: 3,890
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
issamL
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 05 Mar 2016
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 122
Posts: 16
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Heey, this is how i solved the question.

Statement(1) :

x:y = 3:11 implies that x= 3k and y= 11k, hence x can be anything as it depends on the parameter k. So clearly statement 1 is insufficient.

Statement (2) : the least common multiple of x and y equals three times the value of y

We know that X*Y = LCM(x,y) * GCD(x,y) .
by using this fact, we can interpret the S2 as follow: X*Y = 3*Y*GCD(X,Y), which after elimination becomes X= 3*GCD(X,Y). Here again we have no idea about the value of GCD(X,Y) so statement 2 is clearly insufficient.

Now, if we take the two statements together, we can deduct that GCD(X,Y) = K, but does it add any valuable information or input? of course not ! the whole information embedded in one equation can be written as : X= 3 GCD(X,Y)= 3k... so the correct answer is (E).

GL :)
User avatar
rohit8865
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 815
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Products:
Posts: 815
Kudos: 1,008
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
combining the two statements I got X=9 Y=33
isn't values were satisfied and we get answer choice as C
Can anyone explain me please.... :oops:
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,885
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,251
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rohit8865
combining the two statements I got X=9 Y=33
isn't values were satisfied and we get answer choice as C
Can anyone explain me please.... :oops:

What if x = 3 and y = 11?
avatar
korrag
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Last visit: 27 Nov 2018
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 31
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement (1) is clearly insufficient.

For statement (2), LCM of x and y is 3y.
x=3 and x=3y both satisfy this constraint.

Using both (1) and (2) also we don't get any more usable information.
Hence, answer is 'E'.
User avatar
mvictor
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,118
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
Posts: 2,118
Kudos: 1,277
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
we are given only absolute value. this is not sufficient to get a definite value for x. since multiple options are possible, the answer should be E.
I tried to apply LCM/GCF formula, got to x=x. thus, can't do anything :)
avatar
mike2100
Joined: 29 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
Posts: 18
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi guys , can anyone let me know where my mistake is :
from the 2ed statement : we got , x=3 or x=3y
now if we combine the two statements :
x/y = 3/11
let's try x=3 , we got y=11
let's try x=3y , we got 3y/y =3/11
that means 3=3/11
which is not possible , so x=3 and y=11 so i picked c
why am I getting this ?
Bunuel
please
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,050
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi mike2100,

If you consider Fact 2 by itself, then X COULD equal 3Y... meaning that X > Y. However, when you include the ratio in Fact 1, we know that X < Y... so X = 3Y is NOT a possibility.

Consider these two options that fit BOTH facts:
X = 3, Y = 11.... this fits the ratio 3:11 and the LCM is 33 (which is the value of 3Y).
X = 6, Y = 22.... this ratio (6:22) reduces to 3:11 and the LCM is 66 (which is the value of 3Y).

We now have two different possible values for X, so the final answer is INSUFFICIENT.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
mike2100
Joined: 29 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
Posts: 18
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thanks for your reply , I understand that by testing values we get E , but I'm confused because my approach seems logical ,

EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi mike2100,

If you consider Fact 2 by itself, then X COULD equal 3Y... meaning that X > Y. However, when you include the ratio in Fact 1, we know that X < Y... so X = 3Y is NOT a possibility.

ok so now since 3y is not a possibility , are we left with only x=3 ? :?
User avatar
m1033512
Joined: 25 Feb 2019
Last visit: 27 Oct 2019
Posts: 276
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Products:
Posts: 276
Kudos: 237
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO E

from first we get

x = 3k
y = 11 k

from second statement we get ,

LCM = 3y

x*y*k = 3y

or xyk-3y = 0

y(xk-3) = 0

y=0 or xk-3 = 0

Y = 0 not possible

so xk-3=0

which is again the same equation as in statement 1

So IMO E


hope this helps

award kudos if helpful

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,050
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi mike2100,

I think that the general error in your thinking has to do with the information in Fact 2: "The least common multiple of X and Y equals three times the value of Y." This does NOT necessarily mean that X = 3Y. Since we're dealing with the LCM of a pair of integers, it's quite likely that the LCM is GREATER than both X and Y - but your work implies that the LCM is equal to X.

When dealing with Quant questions on the GMAT, if you're ever unsure about a math rule or whether you're properly interpreting a math pattern or not, the easiest way to prove if your thinking is correct is to come up with a couple of examples and see if they confirm that your idea is correct. In that way, TESTing VALUES can be useful on MOST Quant questions.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
mike2100
Joined: 29 Aug 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 83
Posts: 18
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi mike2100,

I think that the general error in your thinking has to do with the information in Fact 2: "The least common multiple of X and Y equals three times the value of Y." This does NOT necessarily mean that X = 3Y. Since we're dealing with the LCM of a pair of integers, it's quite likely that the LCM is GREATER than both X and Y - but your work implies that the LCM is equal to X.

When dealing with Quant questions on the GMAT, if you're ever unsure about a math rule or whether you're properly interpreting a math pattern or not, the easiest way to prove if your thinking is correct is to come up with a couple of examples and see if they confirm that your idea is correct. In that way, TESTing VALUES can be useful on MOST Quant questions.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Dear Rich , thanks for your reply ,I think now I know exactly where my mistake was ,

I was thinking :
LCM of x and y is 3y
ok then the 3 must have come from x , so x have 2 options : 3y , 3
and that's correct in case y is a prime , but we don't know that, here's my mistake , right ?
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,050
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi mike2100,

Yes - I think that properly explains the mistake.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,426
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,426
Kudos: 1,508
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi rohankant12,

This question can be solved by TESTing VALUES.

We're asked for the value of X.

Fact 1: X:Y = 3:11

This ratio gives us a 'relationship' between X and Y, but does not tell us what either variable is. We know that X MUST be a multiple of 3 and Y MUST be an equivalent multiple of 11, but we don't have the actual numbers.

IF....X=3, Y=11, then the answer is 3
IF....X=6, Y=22, then the answer is 6
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: The least common multiple of X and Y equals three times the value of Y

You might need to 'play around' with this Fact to figure out the pattern involved. From Fact 1, I'm thinking that we should look for X as a multiple of 3, so I'll start there...

IF...X = 3, then the LCM of X and Y has to be 3 TIMES the value of Y....

IF....X=3, Y=1, then the LCM is 3 (which is 3 times the value of Y) and the answer to the question is 3
IF....X=6, Y=2, then the LCM is 6 (which is 3 times the value of Y) and the answer to the question is 6
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT

Combined, we have evidence that X can be at least 2 different outcomes (3 or 6).
Combined, INSUFFICIENT

Final Asnwer:
As an aside, what is the source of this question?

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Hi Rich I do not know how the examples of statement 2 fulfill statement after you combine both statements. In both examples, the ration is NOT 3/11.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,050
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,050
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Mo2men,

You're correct - the two pairs of values that you highlighted in Fact 2 do NOT fit the information in Fact 1 - so they don't "fit" all of the information that we're given. However, notice how X=3 and X=6 DO fit both Fact 1 and Fact 2. If you do the additional work (which I showed in a follow-up post), then you can prove the following:

X = 3, Y = 11.... this fits the ratio 3:11 and the LCM is 33 (which is the value of 3Y).
X = 6, Y = 22.... this ratio (6:22) reduces to 3:11 and the LCM is 66 (which is the value of 3Y).

Thus, X=3 and X=6 are both possible solutions and the final answer is INSUFFICIENT.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,426
Own Kudos:
1,508
 [1]
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,426
Kudos: 1,508
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EMPOWERgmatRichC
Hi Mo2men,

You're correct - the two pairs of values that you highlighted in Fact 2 do NOT fit the information in Fact 1 - so they don't "fit" all of the information that we're given. However, notice how X=3 and X=6 DO fit both Fact 1 and Fact 2. If you do the additional work (which I showed in a follow-up post), then you can prove the following:

X = 3, Y = 11.... this fits the ratio 3:11 and the LCM is 33 (which is the value of 3Y).
X = 6, Y = 22.... this ratio (6:22) reduces to 3:11 and the LCM is 66 (which is the value of 3Y).

Thus, X=3 and X=6 are both possible solutions and the final answer is INSUFFICIENT.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich

Hi Rich,

Thanks a lot for you reply. Actually, I did the work as you suggest. Because you are neat and organized. I thought it might be helpful for other student to see the solution complete to avoid confusion for them.

Again thank for your effort. :thumbup:
Moderators:
Math Expert
109830 posts
498 posts
212 posts