Last visit was: 27 Apr 2026, 11:14 It is currently 27 Apr 2026, 11:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
gsingh0711
Joined: 02 Mar 2018
Last visit: 15 Aug 2018
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
132
 [14]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q51 V26
GPA: 3.1
Products:
GMAT 1: 640 Q51 V26
Posts: 42
Kudos: 132
 [14]
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
gsingh0711
Joined: 02 Mar 2018
Last visit: 15 Aug 2018
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
132
 [15]
Given Kudos: 29
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q51 V26
GPA: 3.1
Products:
GMAT 1: 640 Q51 V26
Posts: 42
Kudos: 132
 [15]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
prashant6923
Joined: 21 Jul 2012
Last visit: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
93
 [1]
Given Kudos: 52
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
Posts: 62
Kudos: 93
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
faltan
Joined: 12 Mar 2018
Last visit: 11 Jul 2019
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 91
Posts: 70
Kudos: 21
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prashant6923
gsingh0711
Explanation:

As we know | x | = x if x > 0, and | x | = −x if x < 0.

Considering statement 1:
| | x − 1 | − 1 | < 1
⇒ −1 < | x − 1 | − 1 < 1
(If | N | < 1, then N lies between −1 and 1.)

Adding 1 to every side of the inequality ⇒ 0 < | x − 1 | < 2

Considering the LHS of equation,
| x − 1 | > 0 ⇒ x ≠ 1
(Absolute value of any number is always positive as long as the value within modulus is not zero.)

| x − 1 | < 2
⇒ −2 < x − 1 < 2
(If | N | < 2, then N lies between −2 and 2.)
⇒ −1 < x < 3

Since we are getting a definite answer from above statement , statement 1 itself is sufficient to provide the answer.

If X is not equal to 1,how come x lies between -1 and 3?


I agree on that.
gsingh0711

The statement1, "1" should be excluded to say it's sufficient. Statement 2 is sufficient, thus correct answer should be B.
avatar
parijit
Joined: 02 Sep 2018
Last visit: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Posts: 100
Kudos: 169
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel chetan2u VeritasKarishma could you comment here?
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,426
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,426
Kudos: 1,508
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gsingh0711
Given that x is a real number, is −1 < x < 3?

(1) ||x − 1| − 1| < 1

(2) (x + 1)(x − 3) < 0

Dear IanStewart
Bunuel

In statement 1, when x = 1, then the inequality is incorrect. Hence, the solution will be -1<x<1 & 1<x<3. Should statement 1 be sufficient? I doubt because the question includes x=1 in the range −1 < x < 3, and so should be insufficient. What do you think?

Can you help please?

Thanks in advance
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
11,283
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,283
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mo2men
[
In statement 1, when x = 1, then the inequality is incorrect. Hence, the solution will be -1<x<1 & 1<x<3. Should statement 1 be sufficient? I doubt because the question includes x=1 in the range −1 < x < 3, and so should be insufficient. What do you think?

Yes, it should definitely be sufficient. It might be easier to see why with a 250-level example question:

Is x > 0?
1. x = 5
2. x > 3

If you see a question like this, the answer is D. The question is not asking "can x be equal to any positive number at all?" The question is asking "can you be certain that x is a positive number?" Using Statement 1, x clearly cannot be equal to *any* positive number at all -- x is exactly equal to 5. But that's certainly sufficient, because you can be absolutely sure that x is positive. Similarly, using Statement 2, there are positive values, like 1.5 or 2, that x cannot equal. But Statement 2 is also sufficient, because you can be completely certain that x > 0 is true.

Back to the original question - if you can be completely certain that x is somewhere between -1 and 3, you have sufficient information. It's irrelevant if x cannot equal 1, say. If a statement told you "x = 2", or "0 < x < 0.5", that would be sufficient: you would know with absolute certainty that x is somewhere between -1 and 3.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,987
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,987
Kudos: 1,119
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109928 posts
498 posts
212 posts