Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
07 Nov 2019, 02:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
57% (02:15) correct
43%
(01:56)
wrong
based on 350
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
At a community center, three separate pumps- A, B, and C- started to fill an empty swimming pool at 8:00 AM, and each pump worked at its own constant rate until the pool was full. Was the pool completely filled at 3:00 PM?
(1) Working alone, pump C could fill 3/10 of the pool in 126 minutes.
(2) Working together, pumps A and B could fill 1/8 of the pool in 55 minutes.
Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions
(1) Working alone, pump C could fill 3/10 of the pool in 126 minutes.
(2) Working together, pumps A and B could fill 1/8 of the pool in 55 minutes.
Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions
Archit3110
Major Poster
07 Nov 2019, 12:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
total hrs ; 8 am to 3 pm = 7 hrs ; 420 mins
#1
pump C fills pool in ; 126*10/3 ; 420 mins ; 7 hrs
sufficient
#2
rate of a +b ; 55*8 ; 440 mins ; c info not know insufficient as then pool could be filled within 7 hrs or 420 mins ;
IMO A
07 Nov 2019, 12:58
Kudos
Bookmarks
Bunuel
For word problems in general, and rate problems specifically, translate them into math terms as best you can before you continue.
In this problem, we have three pumps working together. So, we'll add their rates together to get an overall rate.
The problem is really an inequality problem! It doesn't ask you to find out exactly when the pool will be filled. It just asks whether it'll be filled by 3pm. 8am to 3pm is 7 hours, so the question is really asking:
Will the pool be filled within 7 hours?
It looks like I'll have to work with rates whether I'd like to or not! That's what you need to do if you have multiple people (or pumps) working together. So, I'll actually phrase the question in terms of rates:
Is the combined rate at least 1/7 pool per hour?
"Pool per hour" is a bit of a weird way to think about a rate, but it's correct here!
Now, statement 1: This will give us pump C's rate. In some situations, I'd just assume this was insufficient. However, this is an inequality problem. Knowing C's rate won't give me the exact rate, sure. But, what if C works REALLY fast - fast enough to fill the pool completely on its own? In that case, this statement actually could be sufficient. So, we have to check.
C's rate is (3/10 pool)/(126 minutes). 126 minutes is very close to 2 hours - can we estimate?
(3/10 pool)/2 hours = 3/20 pool per hour.
Hold on: 3/20 is actually greater than 1/7. (I recognize this because 3/21 = 1/7, and 3/20 has a smaller denominator, so it's bigger.) Is C's rate actually bigger than 1/7 by itself?
If I'm in a hurry, I might just assume that it is. But if I'm not, then I'm going to recall that I estimated. I'll go back and get an exact solution.
126 minutes = 2 hours + 6 minutes = 2 and 1/10 hours, or 21/10 hours
C's rate is (3/10 pool)/(21/10 hours) = 3/21 = 1/7 pool per hour.
Whoa - C would exactly fill the pool up on its own. So, this statement is (barely) sufficient! The pool will certainly be full, no matter what A and B are doing. Eliminate B, C, and E.
Statement 2: We'll approach it similarly. Pumps A and B have a rate of (1/8 pool)/(55 min), or just a bit more than 1/8 of the pool per hour. That's close enough to 1/7 that I'd like to get an exact answer, just to be safe.
55 minutes = 1 hour - 5 minutes = 1 hour - 1/12 hour = 11/12 hours
Rate = (1/8 pool)/(11/12 hours) = 12/88 pool per hour = 3/22 pool per hour.
This is less than 1/7. So, we know that A and B can almost fill the pool on their own. But if C was REALLY slow, A and B still couldn't quite do it. If C was fast, it would be fine. Since we don't know for sure, this statement must be insufficient.
The answer is A.
