Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 03:14 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 03:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,773
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,773
Kudos: 810,733
 [27]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
26
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,773
Own Kudos:
810,733
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,853
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,773
Kudos: 810,733
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
ArunSharma12
Joined: 25 Oct 2015
Last visit: 20 Jul 2022
Posts: 512
Own Kudos:
1,036
 [3]
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 512
Kudos: 1,036
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ankita1905
Joined: 20 Jan 2020
Last visit: 19 Sep 2024
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 228
Posts: 4
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1)
case1 : Put x=-1 L.HS = RHS
case2 : Put x=0 LHS = RHS
case3 : Put x=1 LHS=RHS

Therefore statement 1 is not sufficient on its own

(2)
For, x=-1,1 we get LHS=RHS .
Therefore statement 2 not sufficient.

Both statements 1 and 2 , still gives us two possibilities for x can be 1 or -1.

The question cannot be answered using both the statements together .
Correct option [E]
avatar
AdiBatman
Joined: 18 Feb 2020
Last visit: 16 Jul 2020
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 164
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
Posts: 32
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In statement 2, I think x can be referred to only +1. Can there be any negative factorial.
But yes x can be 0 in statement 2. It's still not sufficient alone. Neither they are sufficient together with two answers 0 and 1.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 6,976
Own Kudos:
16,904
 [2]
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,976
Kudos: 16,904
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
What is the value of integer x?


(1) \(|x| = \sqrt{|x|}\)

(2) \((|x|)! = \sqrt{|x|}\)

Question: x = ?

STatement 1: \(|x| = \sqrt{|x|}\)

x = 0 or 1 or -1 hence

NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: \((|x|)! = \sqrt{|x|}\)

x = 1 or -1 hence

NOT SUFFICIENT

Combining the two statements

x = 1 or -1 hence

NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: Option E
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,808
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 678
Posts: 1,808
Kudos: 2,090
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AdiBatman
In statement 2, I think x can be referred to only +1. Can there be any negative factorial.
But yes x can be 0 in statement 2. It's still not sufficient alone. Neither they are sufficient together with two answers 0 and 1.

Posted from my mobile device

Hi AdiBatman,

Please note you cannot have \(x=0\) in statement 2. If you put \(x=0\) in statement 2 then LHS =1 and RHS = 0 hence they would not be equal. Please note 0!=1 ( Zero factorial = 1 and NOT zero )

Hope it helps.
User avatar
mcolbert
Joined: 25 Mar 2014
Last visit: 09 Mar 2026
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 190
Posts: 12
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is the source of this problem? I know that the convention that 0! = 1 is not vital to the problem, as (1) and (2) each alone or together are not sufficient even ignoring this convention. But would GMAT really test knowledge of the convention that 0! = 1?
User avatar
Mck2023
Joined: 23 Feb 2020
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 297
Location: Nepal
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
GMAT 1: 650 Q44 V35
Posts: 129
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ArunSharma12
Bunuel
What is the value of integer x?


(1) \(|x| = \sqrt{|x|}\)

(2) \((|x|)! = \sqrt{|x|}\)

statement 1:
\(|x| = \sqrt{|x|}\)
\(|x|^2 = |x|\); \(|x|(|x|-1) = 0\)
x = [0,1,-1]
not sufficient

statement 2:
\((|x|)! = \sqrt{|x|}\)
\((|x|)!^2 = |x|\)
x = [1,-1]
not sufficient

combining both statements, x can be [1,-1]
not sufficient
Ans :E[/quote]

Hi ArunSharma12
Can you please further explain the squaring og factiriL in statement 2. I mean further steps after step 2.....
Thank you.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
ArunSharma12
Joined: 25 Oct 2015
Last visit: 20 Jul 2022
Posts: 512
Own Kudos:
1,036
 [1]
Given Kudos: 74
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38 (Online)
Posts: 512
Kudos: 1,036
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mck2023

ArunSharma12

statement 2:
\((|x|)! = \sqrt{|x|}\)
\((|x|)!^2 = |x|\)
x = [1,-1]
not sufficient
Can you please further explain the squaring of factorial in statement 2. I mean further steps after step 2.....

Hi Mck2023,

we do not have to simplify the equation further.
\((|x|!)^2 = |x|\)
we need some integer for which its factorial equals the integer itself.
I would start from
    0: \(0! = 1 \ne 0\)
    1: 1! = 1 = 1
    2: 2! = 2 , but \((2)^2 \ne 2\)
    ..
1 satisfies the equation and as the x is under mod we can also take x as -1.
possible solutions for x: [-1,1]
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
11,270
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,270
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mcolbert
But would GMAT really test knowledge of the convention that 0! = 1?

No, that's not something the GMAT would ever test. Factorials will only ever be applied to positive integers on the GMAT.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
36,448
 [1]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,448
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mcolbert
What is the source of this problem? I know that the convention that 0! = 1 is not vital to the problem, as (1) and (2) each alone or together are not sufficient even ignoring this convention. But would GMAT really test knowledge of the convention that 0! = 1?

In order to apply the combinations formula, nCr = n!/(r!)(n-r)!, we need to know that 0! = 1
For example, if there are 3 employees, and we need to choose 3 of them for a committee, we can do this in 3C3 ways.
Applying the formula, 3C3 = 3!/(3!)(3-3)! = 3!/(3!)(0!)
So, if we don't know that 0! = 1, we can't properly evaluate 3C3
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,270
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BrentGMATPrepNow

In order to apply the combinations formula, nCr = n!/(r!)(n-r)!, we need to know that 0! = 1
For example, if there are 3 employees, and we need to choose 3 of them for a committee, we can do this in 3C3 ways.
Applying the formula, 3C3 = 3!/(3!)(3-3)! = 3!/(3!)(0!)
So, if we don't know that 0! = 1, we can't properly evaluate 3C3

Hope you're doing well Brent!

Counting formulas are unnecessary to begin with, but I imagine many test takers use them. But the answer to the question "how many different 3-person committees can you make from a group of 3 people" is obviously "one". There's no need to use a formula to answer a question like that. And that's true any time you might end up seeing "0!" somewhere, if you do answer counting questions using formulas -- it's always a situation where the answer would be immediately clear if you didn't use a formula at all.
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2025
Posts: 6,733
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,733
Kudos: 36,448
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
BrentGMATPrepNow

In order to apply the combinations formula, nCr = n!/(r!)(n-r)!, we need to know that 0! = 1
For example, if there are 3 employees, and we need to choose 3 of them for a committee, we can do this in 3C3 ways.
Applying the formula, 3C3 = 3!/(3!)(3-3)! = 3!/(3!)(0!)
So, if we don't know that 0! = 1, we can't properly evaluate 3C3

Hope you're doing well Brent!

Counting formulas are unnecessary to begin with, but I imagine many test takers use them. But the answer to the question "how many different 3-person committees can you make from a group of 3 people" is obviously "one". There's no need to use a formula to answer a question like that. And that's true any time you might end up seeing "0!" somewhere, if you do answer counting questions using formulas -- it's always a situation where the answer would be immediately clear if you didn't use a formula at all.

Hey Ian,

Greetings from Vancouver Island!
I agree; from the context of a counting question, we can readily infer that 0! = 1
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,959
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,959
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109773 posts
498 posts
212 posts