Does Company X strive to maintain a low defect rate in order to ensure

Question

Does Company X strive to maintain a low defect rate in order to ensure product quality?

(1) Company X's manufacturing process has a defect rate of 2% according to quality control data.

(2) Monitoring the defect rate in a manufacturing process is essential to ensure product quality, and a low percentage indicates a well-maintained production process.

ID: 700340

Source: Official Guide 2024-25 (Data Insight Review)

MartyMurray · Answer

Does Company X strive to maintain a low defect rate in order to ensure product quality?

"Does Company X strive to maintain a low defect rate?" means "Does Company X seek to or take steps to maintain a low defect rate?"

(1) Company X's manufacturing process has a defect rate of 2% according to quality control data.

This information indicates that Company X has a low defect rate.

However, it doesn't indicate whether Company X "strives" to achieve that rate. It could be that Company X just happens to have that rate without striving for it.

Insufficient.

(2) Monitoring the defect rate in a manufacturing process is essential to ensure product quality, and a low percentage indicates a well-maintained production process.

This general statement says nothing about Company X specifically.

So, since the question stem provides no information about Company X, with this statement we still have no information about Company X.

Insufficient.

(1) and (2) combined

Given the information from statement (1) that Company X has a low defect rate and the information from statement (2) that a low percentage indicates a well maintained production process, we can say that Company X must have a well maintained production process.

At the same time, since having a well maintained production process and striving to maintain a low defect rate are not the same thing, even with the combined statements, we don't have information indicating whether Company X strives to maintain a low defect rate or just maintains its production process well for some other reason.

Insufficient.

Correct answer:  E

GMATinsight · Answer

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION   
 Inference

(1) Knowing that quality control data says the defect rate for Company’s X’s manufacturing process is 2% tells us nothing about whether Company X strives to maintain a low defect rate. First, the quality control data may be inaccurate or fraudulent. Second, without further context, we can’t tell whether a 2% defect rate is low or high. And finally, even if a 2% defect rate is low, we don’t know whether Company X is striving to keep it low to ensure product quality. Thus, whether Company X strives to maintain a low defect rate in order to ensure product quality cannot be determined from (1) alone; NOT sufficient.

(2) Even if monitoring the defect rate in a manufacturing process is essential to ensure product quality, Company X may not monitor it. And even if a low defect rate indicates a well-maintained production process, Company X’s defect rate may be high. Thus, whether Company X strives to maintain a low defect rate in order to ensure product quality cannot be determined from (2) alone; NOT sufficient.

Even if (1) is true, the real defect rate for Company X’s manufacturing process might be higher than the quality control data suggests. And even if the defect rate is really 2%, that might be quite a high rate for Company X’s product and manufacturing process. If the defect rate is high, then (2) does not imply that Company X is striving to maintain a low defect rate. Thus, (1) and (2) together don’t tell us whether Company X strives to maintain a low defect rate.

The correct answer is E; both statements together are still not sufficient.

Gemmie · Answer

Statement 1:  Company X's manufacturing process has a defect rate of 2% according to quality control data.This statement gives us a factual piece of information about the defect rate at Company X. However, it doesn't tell us anything about the company's intentions or strategies. It simply states the current defect rate without any insight

=> Insufficient

Statement 2:  Monitoring the defect rate in a manufacturing process is essential to ensure product quality, and a low percentage indicates a well-maintained production process.

This statement provides general information about the relationship between defect rates and product quality. It explains that a low defect rate is typically associated with a well-maintained production process and that monitoring defect rates is crucial for ensuring quality. However, it is a general statement about manufacturing practices and does not specifically address Company X's practices or intentions.

=> Insufficient

Combined:

(a) There are possibilities where we can't be certain:

- The company might be satisfied with a 2% defect rate.
- The industry standard might be higher than 2%, making 2% an acceptable rate for the company.

(b) The fact that Company X has a low defect rate (2%) does not necessarily imply that this is due to deliberate efforts to ensure product quality. The statements do not provide any direct evidence of Company X's policies, practices, or intentions regarding maintaining a low defect rate.

(c) While Statement (2) explains that a low defect rate is essential for quality, it does not specifically say that Company X monitors and strives to achieve this low defect rate as a part of their quality assurance process. The information remains general and does not tie back directly to Company X’s practices.

(d) The low defect rate mentioned in Statement (1) could be due to factors other than a deliberate effort to maintain quality, such as automation, technological advancements, industry standards, or luck. Without additional information linking the defect rate to the company’s specific actions or strategies to ensure product quality, we cannot conclusively determine the company's intent.

==> Insufficient

randomname4 · Answer

Key issue: the question is asking about Company X’s intention/goal, not just whether its defect rate is low.

Statement (1)

Company X has a defect rate of 2%.

This tells us the defect rate, but it does not tell us whether Company X is actively trying to maintain it for product quality.

Maybe they strive to maintain it.
Maybe the 2% happened by chance.
Maybe they care more about cost than quality.

So statement (1) is not sufficient.

Statement (2)

Monitoring defect rates is important for quality, and a low percentage indicates a well-maintained process.

This is just a general principle. It does not tell us anything specific about Company X.

So statement (2) is not sufficient.

Together

Together, we know:

Company X has a 2% defect rate.
Low defect rates are generally good for quality.

But we still do not know whether Company X strives to maintain that low defect rate in order to ensure product quality.

So even together, the statements are not sufficient.

Answer: E.

Aaryan911 · Answer

MartyMurray 
can we even assume 2% is a low defect rate?

MartyMurray · Answer

Good question. 2% actually seems kind of high.

I'd like to think that we can't assume that it's low.

At the same time, some of these Verbal DS questions are not very tightly constructed. So, it's a little dangerous to assume that the creators of the question had the sense to realize that 2% may not be low. So, in a case in which something like that would matter, I might consider not only what makes sense but also what the question creators likely believed. Hopefully, the questions we see on our tests won't require such consideration though.

Does Company X strive to maintain a low defect rate in order to ensure

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Data Sufficiency (DS) Questions

Does Company X strive to maintain a low defect rate in order to ensure

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards