Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
26 Jan 2026, 22:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
79% (01:17) correct
21%
(01:23)
wrong
based on 78
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Each of the 600 cars in a certain parking lot is either a hatchback or a sedan. How many of the hatchbacks are electric?
(1) 75% of all cars in the parking lot are electric.
(2) The number of electric sedans is 25% more than the number of electric hatchbacks.
(1) 75% of all cars in the parking lot are electric.
(2) The number of electric sedans is 25% more than the number of electric hatchbacks.
27 Jan 2026, 00:36
Kudos
Bookmarks
ExpertsGlobal5
The total number of vehicles in the parking lot is 600.
The vehicles are either sedan or hatchback.
We need to find the number of hatch back electric. ?
Let’s create a 2*2 matrix
| Electric | ~ Electric | Total | |
| Sedan | |||
| Hatchback | ? | ||
| Total | 600 |
Statement 1:
75% of all cars in the parking lot are electric.
(3/4)*600 = 450 cars are electric.
So. 150 cars are not electric.
| Electric | ~ Electric | Total | |
| Sedan | |||
| Hatchback | ? | ||
| Total | 450 | 150 | 600 |
We cannot find the number of Hatchback Electric.
Hence, Insufficient.
Statement 2:
The number of electric sedans is 25% more than the number of electric hatchbacks.
| Electric | ~ Electric | Total | |
| Sedan | 5x | ||
| Hatchback | ? 4x | ||
| Total | 9x | 600 |
Electric sedan = (5/4)* Electric Hatchback
Electric sedan: Electric hatchback = 5x : 4x
We cannot find the number of Hatchback Electric.
Hence, Insufficient.
Combining both statements , we get
| Electric | ~ Electric | Total | |
| Sedan | 5x | ||
| Hatchback | ? 4x | ||
| Total | 450 = 9x | 600 |
450 = 9x.
Thus, x =50
Hatchback Electric = 4x = 4*50 = 200.
Hence, Sufficient
Option C
27 Jan 2026, 00:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
Each of the 600 cars in a certain parking lot is either a hatchback or a sedan. How many of the hatchbacks are electric?
(1) 75% of all cars in the parking lot are electric.
(2) The number of electric sedans is 25% more than the number of electric hatchbacks.
Let the number of Electric hatchbacks be EH, number of Electric sedans be ES, Non-Electric hatchbacks be NEH and Non-Electric sedans be NES.
EH + ES + NEH + NES = 600
Now, let's look at each statement individually and then at both of them together (if required):
Statement 1: 75% of all cars in the parking lot are electric.
=> 75% of 600 = 450
=> EH + ES = 450
However, this doesn't tell us anything about the value of EH. Thus, this statement is insufficient alone.
Now, let's take a look at Statement 2 closely:
Statement 2: The number of electric sedans is 25% more than the number of electric hatchbacks.
=> ES = 5/4 * EH
However, we still cannot calculate the value of EH using this statement alone. Thus, Statement 2 is insufficient alone too.
Now, let's look at the combination of both the statements:
=> EH + ES = 450
=> ES = 5/4 * EH
=> EH + 5/4 * EH = 450
Thus, 9/4 * EH = 450
=> EH = 200
Hence, the correct answer is Option C - BOTH statements together are sufficient, but NEITHER statement alone is sufficient.
Hope this helps!
(1) 75% of all cars in the parking lot are electric.
(2) The number of electric sedans is 25% more than the number of electric hatchbacks.
Let the number of Electric hatchbacks be EH, number of Electric sedans be ES, Non-Electric hatchbacks be NEH and Non-Electric sedans be NES.
EH + ES + NEH + NES = 600
Now, let's look at each statement individually and then at both of them together (if required):
Statement 1: 75% of all cars in the parking lot are electric.
=> 75% of 600 = 450
=> EH + ES = 450
However, this doesn't tell us anything about the value of EH. Thus, this statement is insufficient alone.
Now, let's take a look at Statement 2 closely:
Statement 2: The number of electric sedans is 25% more than the number of electric hatchbacks.
=> ES = 5/4 * EH
However, we still cannot calculate the value of EH using this statement alone. Thus, Statement 2 is insufficient alone too.
Now, let's look at the combination of both the statements:
=> EH + ES = 450
=> ES = 5/4 * EH
=> EH + 5/4 * EH = 450
Thus, 9/4 * EH = 450
=> EH = 200
Hence, the correct answer is Option C - BOTH statements together are sufficient, but NEITHER statement alone is sufficient.
Hope this helps!
