Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 04:01 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 04:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
study
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Last visit: 22 Mar 2022
Posts: 159
Own Kudos:
4,017
 [11]
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 159
Kudos: 4,017
 [11]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
shalva
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools:Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Posts: 202
Kudos: 346
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
flgators519
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Last visit: 05 Sep 2014
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
23
 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Affiliations: University of Florida Alumni
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Wharton, Booth, Stanford, HBS
Posts: 24
Kudos: 23
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
flgators519
Joined: 25 Oct 2009
Last visit: 05 Sep 2014
Posts: 24
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Affiliations: University of Florida Alumni
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Wharton, Booth, Stanford, HBS
Posts: 24
Kudos: 23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Putting them together lets you realize that the answer is x=0. however, it doesn't ask what is X. Anyone confirm my answer?

Thanks
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,822
Own Kudos:
811,141
 [4]
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,822
Kudos: 811,141
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
study
Is \(|x - 5| \gt 4\) ?

1. \(x\) is an integer
2. \(x^2 \lt 1\)

From qs stem:
1 > x >9

Frm statement 1 - no help

Frm Statement 2
I get -1 < x < +1

C

\(|x - 5|>4\)?
\(x<5\) --> \(-x+5>4\) --> \(x<1\)
\(x>5\) --> \(x-5>4\) --> \(x>9\)

So we get that \(|x - 5|>4\) holds true when \(x<1\)OR \(x>9\)

(1) \(x\) is an integer --> Clearly insufficient.

(2) \(x^2<1\) --> \(-1<x<1\) --> any \(x\) from this range will surely be in the range \(x<1\), hence for ANY \(x\) from the range \(-1<x<1\) the inequality \(|x - 5|>4\) holds true. Sufficient.

Answer: B.
User avatar
shalva
User avatar
Tuck School Moderator
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 202
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Location: Tbilisi, Georgia
Schools:Stanford (in), Tuck (WL), Wharton (ding), Cornell (in)
Posts: 202
Kudos: 346
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You're right. We need to determine whether |x-5|>4 or not... Nothing about value of x :oops:
User avatar
fall2009
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Last visit: 17 Dec 2009
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 37
Kudos: 93
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B.
2) -1<x<1.
If x=1 = max => |x-5| = 4 = min
But x<1 => |x-5|>4.
User avatar
Prometoh
Joined: 11 Sep 2009
Last visit: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
Posts: 33
Kudos: 79
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
one for B

From the question stem, we derive x<1 or x > 9
(1) is obviously insufficient
(2) -1 < x < 1; thus, (2) is sufficient
User avatar
ENAFEX
Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Last visit: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Status:And the Prep starts again...
Concentration: IT Consulting
GMAT 1: 490 Q42 V17
Posts: 84
Kudos: 280
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
study
Is \(|x - 5| \gt 4\) ?

1. \(x\) is an integer
2. \(x^2 \lt 1\)

From qs stem:
1 > x >9

Frm statement 1 - no help

Frm Statement 2
I get -1 < x < +1

C

\(|x - 5|>4\)?
\(x<5\) --> \(-x+5>4\) --> \(x<1\)
\(x>5\) --> \(x-5>4\) --> \(x>9\)

So we get that \(|x - 5|>4\) holds true when \(x<1\)OR \(x>9\)

(1) \(x\) is an integer --> Clearly insufficient.

(2) \(x^2<1\) --> \(-1<x<1\) --> any \(x\) from this range will surely be in the range \(x<1\), hence for ANY \(x\) from the range \(-1<x<1\) the inequality \(|x - 5|>4\) holds true. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Bunuel, How does \(x^{2}\leq 1\)transform to \(-1<x<1\)?

Isn't it supposed to be

X< 1 or -1?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,822
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,822
Kudos: 811,141
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ENAFEX
Bunuel
study
Is \(|x - 5| \gt 4\) ?

1. \(x\) is an integer
2. \(x^2 \lt 1\)

From qs stem:
1 > x >9

Frm statement 1 - no help

Frm Statement 2
I get -1 < x < +1

C

\(|x - 5|>4\)?
\(x<5\) --> \(-x+5>4\) --> \(x<1\)
\(x>5\) --> \(x-5>4\) --> \(x>9\)

So we get that \(|x - 5|>4\) holds true when \(x<1\)OR \(x>9\)

(1) \(x\) is an integer --> Clearly insufficient.

(2) \(x^2<1\) --> \(-1<x<1\) --> any \(x\) from this range will surely be in the range \(x<1\), hence for ANY \(x\) from the range \(-1<x<1\) the inequality \(|x - 5|>4\) holds true. Sufficient.

Answer: B.

Bunuel, How does \(x^{2}\leq 1\)transform to \(-1<x<1\)?

Isn't it supposed to be

X< 1 or -1?

When you are not sure about the ranges when solving inequalities it's a good idea to test some numbers. So, first ask yourself what does x<-1 or x<1 even mean (it does not make any sense). Next, try some numbers from the range you have (whatever it is) to see whether x^2<1 holds true for them.

Solution:
\(x^2<{1}\), since both parts of the inequality are non-negative then we can take square root: \(|x|<{1}\) --> \(-1<{x}<{1}\).

Now, other approach would be: \(x^2-1<{0}\) --> \((x+1)(x-1)<{0}\) --> the roots are -1 and 1 --> "<" sign indicates that the solution lies between the roots, so \(-1<{x}<{1}\).

Solving inequalities:
x2-4x-94661.html#p731476 (check this one first)
inequalities-trick-91482.html
data-suff-inequalities-109078.html
range-for-variable-x-in-a-given-inequality-109468.html?hilit=extreme#p873535
everything-is-less-than-zero-108884.html?hilit=extreme#p868863

Hope it helps.
User avatar
ENAFEX
Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Last visit: 25 Oct 2012
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Status:And the Prep starts again...
Concentration: IT Consulting
GMAT 1: 490 Q42 V17
Posts: 84
Kudos: 280
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hmmm, still missing something. But little better after reading the posts.

x<-1 or x<1 is not valid because these values do not satisfy the condition (x+1)(x-1)<0

Ok, now my question is (x+1)(x-1)<0

is (x+1)<0 AND (x-1)<0

How does (x+1)<0 become x>-1? While moving 1 to the right hand side we are not supposed to change the sign right?

for example x+3<0,
is x<-3 and not x>-3?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,822
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,822
Kudos: 811,141
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ENAFEX
hmmm, still missing something. But little better after reading the posts.

x<-1 or x<1 is not valid because these values do not satisfy the condition (x+1)(x-1)<0

Ok, now my question is (x+1)(x-1)<0

is (x+1)<0 AND (x-1)<0

How does (x+1)<0 become x>-1? While moving 1 to the right hand side we are not supposed to change the sign right?

for example x+3<0,
is x<-3 and not x>-3?

From x+1<0 you can simply move 1 to the other side of the inequality: x<-1.

Or: x+1<0 --> add -1 to both sides: x<-1. In this case you are not multiplying inequality by a negative number so there is no need to flip the sign.

The same way x+3<0 --> x<-3.

It seems that you should brush up fundamentals on inequality.
User avatar
LogicGuru1
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Last visit: 28 May 2024
Posts: 463
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Posts: 463
Kudos: 2,645
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is |x - 5| > 4 ?

(1) x is an integer
(2) x^2 < 1

No need to even solve this one . Just use common sense

(1) x is an integer
X can be any positive or negative number ; INSUFFICIENT.

(2) x^2 < 1
Only decimal between \((-1 AND 1)^2\) and \((0)^2\) are less than 1; all other numbers (+ve or -ve) whenever squared will give a number >1
So based on second statement x= 0.xyz or -0.xyz
Adding 0.xyz to 5 will increase the value of 5 ==>SUFFICIENT
subtracting 0.xyz from 5 will decrease the value of 5 but can never make it less than 4 ; to make 5 less than 4 we need 1 but here we are getting a decimal 0.xyz ==> SUFFICIENT

ANSWER IS B
User avatar
FlyingCycle
Joined: 13 Jun 2020
Last visit: 06 Apr 2024
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 39
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

when you have (x+1)(x-1) < 0. This gives us two cases to test right:
Either,
CASE I:
(x+1) is positive and (x-1) is negative
OR
CASE II
(x+1) is negative and (x-1) is positive

When you solve these:
CASE I:
(x+1) > 0
x > -1
(x-1) < 0
x < 1
so now we have one range -1<x<1 Fair enough. Now my doubt comes when we check CASE II

CASE II
(x+1) is negative and (x-1) is positive
x+1 < 0
x < -1
x-1 > 0
x > 1
now the range is x < -1 and x > 1. Why are we not considering this? Am I missing something?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,822
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,878
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,822
Kudos: 811,141
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
FlyingCycle
Bunuel

when you have (x+1)(x-1) < 0. This gives us two cases to test right:
Either,
CASE I:
(x+1) is positive and (x-1) is negative
OR
CASE II
(x+1) is negative and (x-1) is positive

When you solve these:
CASE I:
(x+1) > 0
x > -1
(x-1) < 0
x < 1
so now we have one range -1<x<1 Fair enough. Now my doubt comes when we check CASE II

CASE II
(x+1) is negative and (x-1) is positive
x+1 < 0
x < -1
x-1 > 0
x > 1
now the range is x < -1 and x > 1. Why are we not considering this? Am I missing something?

CASE II, x < -1 AND x > 1 is not possible. x cannot be simultaneously less than -1 and more than 1.

Or, consider this x + 1 is more than x - 1 and you cannot have x + 1 < 0 and x -1 > 0.
User avatar
FlyingCycle
Joined: 13 Jun 2020
Last visit: 06 Apr 2024
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 39
Kudos: 18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you Bunuel. Yes when I scribbled in the paper then I got it.
I do not know, while solving, why didn't I opt for curvy method.

Thanks a lot.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,977
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,977
Kudos: 1,117
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109822 posts
498 posts
212 posts