Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 18:15 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 18:15
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
bibha
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Last visit: 06 Jan 2011
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 95
Kudos: 1,229
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,754
Own Kudos:
810,671
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,754
Kudos: 810,671
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sag
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Last visit: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Location: I N D I A
Posts: 103
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
neoreaves
Joined: 09 Apr 2010
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 37
Kudos: 335
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1) this is not enough ....lets look at two possibilities

x = 0 y = -1
in this case |x| > |y|
x = 3 y = 2
in this case |x| < |y|

So insufficient


2) x! is always positive so adding this to |y| will increase y thus x > y

so |x| > |y|

Sufficient

So IMO answer should be B
User avatar
lprassanth
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Last visit: 08 Aug 2016
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 20
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:

2) x! is always positive [highlight]so adding this to |y| will increase y thus x > y
so |x| > |y|[/highlight]
Sufficient
So IMO answer should be B
I'm curious how you can say which one of x or y is greater. Does this statement not just say that x,y>0. So should the answer not be (C).
Please correct me if/where i'm wrong.
avatar
toshio86
Joined: 14 May 2010
Last visit: 10 Dec 2010
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:CBS
GPA: 4.0
Posts: 16
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sorry I don't understand why the 2nd stmt is sufficient...

If we consider x^y=x! + |y| and we plug in y=0, we get two solutions:

x=0 (since 0^0=1 and 0!=1)
x=1 (since 1^0=1 and 1!=1)

So we have y=0, x=0 >>>> |x|=|y|
but we also have y=0, x=1 >>>> |x|>|y|

(if you try with y=2, you will get x=2, so y=x again)

So stmt 2 should be insufficient...
User avatar
lprassanth
Joined: 07 Apr 2010
Last visit: 08 Aug 2016
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 20
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It would be great if either of Bunnel or Fig clarify on this point.
User avatar
dixitraghav
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Last visit: 19 May 2017
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
Posts: 75
Kudos: 156
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hey anybody could explain this? Bunnel?
avatar
toshio86
Joined: 14 May 2010
Last visit: 10 Dec 2010
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:CBS
GPA: 4.0
Posts: 16
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Just to give it a try, while waiting for Bunuel... :wink:

stmt 1

If x=0, y=-1, stmt 1 is satisfied, and |x|<|y|
If x=1, y=0, stmt 1 is satisfied, and |x|>|y|

not sufficient

stmt 2

If we consider x^y=x! + |y| and we plug in y=0, we get two solutions:

x=0 (since 0^0=1 and 0!=1)
x=1 (since 1^0=1 and 1!=1)

So we have y=0, x=0 >>>> |x|=|y|
but we also have y=0, x=1 >>>> |x|>|y|

(if you try with y=2, you will get x=2, so |x|=|y| again)

not sufficient

stmt 1 + stmt 2

The only acceptable solution that satisfies both stmt 1 and 2 is
y=0, x=1

If you try to plug in stmt 2 other values for x and y that satisfy stmt 1 (eg, x=2, y=1; x=3, y=2; x=5, y=4), you'll see that there are no other acceptable solutions.

So, if y=0 and x=1, |x|>|y|

Answer C (I hope so!)

Any opinions?
User avatar
bhandariavi
Joined: 04 Apr 2010
Last visit: 14 Mar 2012
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 89
Kudos: 705
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Simple correction!
0 raised to the 0 power is undefined. U cant say 0^0 = 1.
avatar
toshio86
Joined: 14 May 2010
Last visit: 10 Dec 2010
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Schools:CBS
GPA: 4.0
Posts: 16
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
it looks like 0^0=1, at least according to most of the sources...
Have a look here:

gmatclub dot com/forum/0-raised-to-9060 dot html (sorry I'm a new member and I can't post links yet!)

but it also says we shouldn't need 0^0 for the GMAT :?
avatar
Pipp
Joined: 19 Jun 2010
Last visit: 31 Aug 2010
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
34
 [1]
Posts: 11
Kudos: 34
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ii. x^y = x! + |y|


x! and |y| are both integers, so x! + |y| is also integer, therefore x^y must be integer, which means y must be greater or equal zero so as not to make x^y a fraction. Now knowing that x,y are integers greater than or equal zero, we need to find the value of x,y for which the equation is true. I can only find x=2 y=2 that satisfy the equation, which gives me a B
User avatar
bogos
Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Last visit: 27 May 2011
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 22
Kudos: 37
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My answer is E.

Statement1:
First, recall that |a+b|<=|a|+|b|, therefore
|x|=|y+1|<=|y|+1
meaning that |x| is either equal to |y|+1 or inferior to |y|+1
then NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2:
as x! is used, hence x>=0
if x=0, then y=0, since 0^0 is not accepted, then x>0
if y=0, then x^0=x!+0, or x=1, therefore |x|>|y|
if y=1, then x^1=x!+1, there is no solution of x
if y=2, then x^2=x!+2, or x=2, therefore |x|=|y|
then NOT SUFFICIENT
User avatar
onedayill
Joined: 25 Feb 2010
Last visit: 08 Mar 2017
Posts: 207
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Posts: 207
Kudos: 341
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'll go with C.

1 is clearly insufficient...

2: Try substituting values of x =0 and y =1 and vice versa.
0 = 1
1 = 1.

Not sufficient.

Together:

The only acceptable solution that satisfies both stmt 1 and 2 is
y=0, x=1

C
User avatar
utfan2424
Joined: 05 Nov 2009
Last visit: 28 Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 22
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think it is C.

(1) If Y is negative, X<Y. If Y is positive or zero, X>Y. (but at least we know they're both integers)
(2) We know X! is always positive and b/c both X&Y are both integers, Y cannot be negative (since anything raised to a negative power, besides 1 or zero, is a non-integer. We can also know that X,Y cannot be 0,1 (b/c you get 0 on the left and 1 on the right), X,Y cannot be 1,1. X,Y CAN be 1,0. We found out that Y & X must both be positive or X,Y is 1,0.
We can't say for sure which is larger. NOT SUFFICIENT

Using both we see that b/c Y is positive or zero, X>Y. So I choose C. Let me know if someone catches something I missed - first post.
User avatar
crack700
Joined: 20 Mar 2010
Last visit: 12 Aug 2016
Posts: 43
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 43
Kudos: 194
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I will go with C.
As per (1) |x|=|y+1|. If y is positive or zero then |x|>|y|
If y is negative then |x|<|y|. So not sufficient.

As per 2
x! is used so x>=0
x!+|y|>=0 and is an integer.So x^y can't be a fraction which means y>=0
But x=1 y=0 and x=2 y=2 produces different results. So not sufficient

Combining 1 and 2
As per 2, x and y both have to be positive So 1 can be re-written as x= y+1
Which means x > y and |x|>|y| as both are positive. So sufficient
User avatar
mainhoon
Joined: 18 Jul 2010
Last visit: 10 Oct 2013
Posts: 532
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Status:Apply - Last Chance
Affiliations: IIT, Purdue, PhD, TauBetaPi
Concentration: $ Finance $
Schools:Wharton, Sloan, Chicago, Haas
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: 8 years in Oil&amp;Gas
Posts: 532
Kudos: 397
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel, Can you please settle the issue? Thanks.

PS what is 0^0?
User avatar
arundas
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Last visit: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Status:ISB, Hyderabad
Concentration: Strategy
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Posts: 99
Kudos: 106
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I was surprises when I read 0 ^ 0 = 1. So I went and check with my best Friend Google. Typed 0 ^ 0 and google returned 1. So I think 0 ^ 0 = 1.
User avatar
DeeptiM
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Last visit: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 141
Kudos: 1,293
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If x and y are integers, is |x| > |y|?
(1) |x| = |y + 1|
(2) x^y = x! + |y|
User avatar
gmatmachoman
Joined: 28 Aug 2010
Last visit: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Posts: 2
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DeeptiM
If x and y are integers, is |x| > |y|?
(1) |x| = |y + 1|
(2) x^y = x! + |y|

St 1 : case 1 X= -9 , y = -10 ( where |X| < |Y|)

|-9| = |-10 +1|

----> 9 = 9

case 2: where |X| > |Y|

X = -3 , Y = 2

Insufficient.

St 2 : X = 2, Y = 2 & X = 1, Y = 0

Inconsistent results. Insufficient.

Combining st 1 & st 2;

use X = 1, Y = 0 ( using both the statements together)

we see |X| > |Y|.

Pick C.

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Data Sufficiency (DS) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
Math Expert
109754 posts
498 posts
212 posts