Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
RenB
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Last visit: 02 Mar 2026
Posts: 389
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 304
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
Schools: Stanford '26 Wharton '26 (D) Booth '26 (D) Yale '26 (D) CBS '26 (A$$$) Darden '26 (WL) HBS '26 (D) Ross '26 (A$$$$) LBS '26 (D) Tuck '26 (A$$) Kellogg '26 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82 
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
Schools: Stanford '26 Wharton '26 (D) Booth '26 (D) Yale '26 (D) CBS '26 (A$$$) Darden '26 (WL) HBS '26 (D) Ross '26 (A$$$$) LBS '26 (D) Tuck '26 (A$$) Kellogg '26 (A)
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
Posts: 389
Kudos:
1,471
13 Nov 2023, 21:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
The following appeared in a memorandum from a member of a financial management and consulting firm:
“We have learned from an employee of Windfall, Ltd., that its accounting department, by checking about 10 percent of the last month’s purchasing invoices for errors and inconsistencies, saved the company some $10,000 in overpayments. In order to help our clients increase their net gains, we should advise each of them to institute a policy of checking all purchasing invoices for errors. Such a recommendation could also help us get the Windfall account by demonstrating to Windfall the rigorousness of our methods.”
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.
Essay-
The argument claims that the recommendation to institute a policy of checking each purchase invoice for errors for all the clients of the management and consulting firm will help them increase their net gains and even help the firm to secure the Windfall account. Stated in this way, the argument fails to mention several key factors on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion of the argument relies on the assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence the argument is weak and has several flaws.
First, the argument readily assumes that one incidence of finding errors by checking a sample number of invoices reflects the accounting department's consistent month-on-month errors in checking the invoices. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. For example, it could be a rare occurrence. It could be possible that the majority of the heads or supervisors of the accounts department were away last month. The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly said or indicated that such errors are a common phenomenon in the accounting department.
Second, the argument claims that such a recommendation will help the firm's clients earn net gains. This is again a weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the costs and the gains from checking invoices. While there may be gains due to such a policy, it is very well possible that the process will cost the company man-hours and these costs exceed the gains obtained from checking the invoices. If the argument had provided evidence that the incremental costs of implementing the policy are negligible, then the argument would have been a lot more convincing.
Finally, if the information obtained from the employee of Windfall Ltd. is insider information which Windfall Ltd. would not have revealed otherwise, such knowledge will make the company suspicious of the firm's methods instead of showing it that the firm's methods are rigorous. Also, what if Windfall Ltd. had already done the cost-benefit analysis for implementing such a policy and found that checking all invoices leads to a net negative and, this information was available publicly, Windfall Ltd. could think that the firm is careless and has not studied Windfall Ltd.' in detail.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts about the incremental costs, source of information, confirmation that the finding is not exceptional, etc. In order to assess the merits of a certain argument, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors such as those mentioned previously. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
Hi!
Can experts please review it?
Sajjad1994 Requesting your suggestions.
Have used the chineseburned template. Got 6 in AWA in my last attempt. Been over 9 months though.
“We have learned from an employee of Windfall, Ltd., that its accounting department, by checking about 10 percent of the last month’s purchasing invoices for errors and inconsistencies, saved the company some $10,000 in overpayments. In order to help our clients increase their net gains, we should advise each of them to institute a policy of checking all purchasing invoices for errors. Such a recommendation could also help us get the Windfall account by demonstrating to Windfall the rigorousness of our methods.”
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.
Essay-
The argument claims that the recommendation to institute a policy of checking each purchase invoice for errors for all the clients of the management and consulting firm will help them increase their net gains and even help the firm to secure the Windfall account. Stated in this way, the argument fails to mention several key factors on the basis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion of the argument relies on the assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence the argument is weak and has several flaws.
First, the argument readily assumes that one incidence of finding errors by checking a sample number of invoices reflects the accounting department's consistent month-on-month errors in checking the invoices. This statement is a stretch and not substantiated in any way. For example, it could be a rare occurrence. It could be possible that the majority of the heads or supervisors of the accounts department were away last month. The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly said or indicated that such errors are a common phenomenon in the accounting department.
Second, the argument claims that such a recommendation will help the firm's clients earn net gains. This is again a weak and unsupported claim as the argument does not demonstrate any correlation between the costs and the gains from checking invoices. While there may be gains due to such a policy, it is very well possible that the process will cost the company man-hours and these costs exceed the gains obtained from checking the invoices. If the argument had provided evidence that the incremental costs of implementing the policy are negligible, then the argument would have been a lot more convincing.
Finally, if the information obtained from the employee of Windfall Ltd. is insider information which Windfall Ltd. would not have revealed otherwise, such knowledge will make the company suspicious of the firm's methods instead of showing it that the firm's methods are rigorous. Also, what if Windfall Ltd. had already done the cost-benefit analysis for implementing such a policy and found that checking all invoices leads to a net negative and, this information was available publicly, Windfall Ltd. could think that the firm is careless and has not studied Windfall Ltd.' in detail.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts about the incremental costs, source of information, confirmation that the finding is not exceptional, etc. In order to assess the merits of a certain argument, it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors such as those mentioned previously. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
Hi!
Can experts please review it?
Sajjad1994 Requesting your suggestions.
Have used the chineseburned template. Got 6 in AWA in my last attempt. Been over 9 months though.
14 Nov 2023, 09:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 - 6 out of 6
Coherence and Connectivity: 6/6
The essay demonstrates excellent coherence and connectivity throughout. The ideas are logically organized, and there is a clear flow from one point to the next. Transitions between paragraphs and sentences are well-executed, contributing to the overall coherence of the essay.
Word Structure: 5.5/6
The word structure is generally strong, with varied sentence structures enhancing readability. However, there are a few instances where sentences could be more concise for greater clarity. Additionally, a slightly more varied vocabulary could be employed to enhance the overall richness of expression.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 6/6
The paragraph structure is well-formed, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The essay includes a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Each paragraph contains a topic sentence that introduces the main point, followed by supporting details and examples. The transition between paragraphs is smooth, contributing to the overall effectiveness of the essay's structure.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The language and grammar used in the essay are strong, with correct and precise sentence structures. The essay is free from grammatical errors, and the language is appropriate for an analytical essay. The writer demonstrates a solid command of language throughout.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The essay employs a strong vocabulary, and the writer demonstrates a good command of language. However, there are a few instances where a slightly more varied vocabulary could be used to enhance the expression of ideas. Introducing a broader range of vocabulary would further enrich the language and expression of the essay.
Overall, the essay is well-structured and effectively conveys the writer's analysis of the argument. Minor improvements in word choice and vocabulary could enhance its overall coherence and impact.
Coherence and Connectivity: 6/6
The essay demonstrates excellent coherence and connectivity throughout. The ideas are logically organized, and there is a clear flow from one point to the next. Transitions between paragraphs and sentences are well-executed, contributing to the overall coherence of the essay.
Word Structure: 5.5/6
The word structure is generally strong, with varied sentence structures enhancing readability. However, there are a few instances where sentences could be more concise for greater clarity. Additionally, a slightly more varied vocabulary could be employed to enhance the overall richness of expression.
Paragraph Structure and Formation: 6/6
The paragraph structure is well-formed, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The essay includes a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Each paragraph contains a topic sentence that introduces the main point, followed by supporting details and examples. The transition between paragraphs is smooth, contributing to the overall effectiveness of the essay's structure.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The language and grammar used in the essay are strong, with correct and precise sentence structures. The essay is free from grammatical errors, and the language is appropriate for an analytical essay. The writer demonstrates a solid command of language throughout.
Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The essay employs a strong vocabulary, and the writer demonstrates a good command of language. However, there are a few instances where a slightly more varied vocabulary could be used to enhance the expression of ideas. Introducing a broader range of vocabulary would further enrich the language and expression of the essay.
Overall, the essay is well-structured and effectively conveys the writer's analysis of the argument. Minor improvements in word choice and vocabulary could enhance its overall coherence and impact.
RenB
Moderator:
