Your ESR is in tandem with how you felt during the test. Improved RC but low CR.
If you push up your CR score, you should see a marked improvement in your overall Verbal score.
The complicated part is that you do well in practice CRs but falter in the official exam. Hence, it is hard to identify your weaknesses.
I suggest you to start from the position of strength - the question stem. Read the question stem first and immediately classify the question as strengthen/weaken/inference/method etc. Then you know that no matter what the argument gives you, it is still just a ... question - a question with which you know how to deal. Then keep your focus on the concept - identifying the conclusion in strengthen/weaken questions, no new information in inference questions etc. Don't worry about the subject matter - the same framework will be applicable to all questions of a specific group. Try this strategy in a few practice tests to figure out how you feel. As I said before, with a Q50, you are set to do well in CR - it's just a matter of learning to deal with the software's mind games now.[/quote]
Thanks Karishma, I will follow this plan for CR. Appreciate links. I guess, since I am unable to pin point my weakness in CR, I will start with strength and then progress bottom up rather than top to bottom.
I gave one additional practice test from GMATPrep exam pack1. Like I said, I had exhausted that before, but it was hard to recollect if I had seen those question before or what were the answers that I had marked earlier. So it kind of felt like a fresh test. Scored V39 (SC 49, RC 35, CR 34). I got 6 CR, 3 RC, 1 SC incorrect. However, post exam, when I tried to resolve those CRs I could solve at least 3 CR correctly before looking at solution. At this time I read them slowly and carefully. I think I will follow this approach for CR practice in untimed phase first, starting with strength.