I chose Oxford over IESE because my career goals don’t align with consulting or investment banking, which IESE is particularly strong in. I’m looking for a more unorthodox path in business strategy within the energy sector. Oxford’s emphasis on sustainability and its globally recognized brand were key factors for me. The Oxford name carries value even in roles that aren’t explicitly MBA-focused, and it offers stronger global mobility—important if I ever return to Canada.
IESE does have significant strengths: it’s a two-year program with more time for personal development and stronger traditional career pathways, especially due to the internship. I feel Oxford allows you to “create your own doors” in ways other programs don’t, even though it’s only one year and employment may be more challenging. I would also say the IESE program is a lot stronger in the academics.
Regarding energy roles, you’ll need to be proactive with networking and creating opportunities yourself. Renewable sectors like wind are currently struggling, and Europe’s spending priorities have shifted toward military spending. So it’s important to be realistic about the market. Ultimately, I’d recommend doing your own due diligence and choosing based on what aligns best with your goals and risk tolerance. I dont think you can go wrong with IESE or Oxford. Both are strong programs
Dobby14
Congrats
maximilius491Could you share which school you ended up attending? And what was your thought process?
I have a similar post-MBA interest in the renewable energy industry in Europe. However, I am slightly concerned about energy roles, as a very small % of the class seems to want or get them, according to the schools (Said, Judge, IESE) employment reports.