I am currently applying to the
LBS MiF, Cambridge MFin, and MIT MFin programs. I have already been admitted to the first two, and for MIT I am scheduled to take the interview and the Quantitative Assessment soon.
I am currently working at a government institution in my home country and have received sponsorship support from my employer. Fortunately, I have been admitted to multiple graduate programs. After completing my studies, I am required to return to my current government institution; however, in the longer term, I aspire to work globally in the private financial sector, such as at a financial institution, investment bank, private equity, or venture capital firm. I have not yet decided on a specific country in which I would like to work.
Given this background, I would appreciate your advice on which of the three finance programs would be the most beneficial for my long-term career. I understand that the programs differ in nature—for example, the average work experience is around 4 to 6 years at LBS and Cambridge, while it is approximately 1 year at MIT—so I assume each program has its own pros and cons.
If you were in my position and had these three options, which program would you choose?