I missed a relatively very easier one, but i tend to blame it on the wording of the problem.
Here it goes:
A racing dog ran 40 races before retiring at age 4. How many races did he win?
(1) He won his first 30 races, all run before the age of 4.
(2) He lost 25 percent of his races before age 4, won none of his last 10 races, and won 75 percent of his races overall.
In this question, do you guys think the question asked has a good wording? It does not clarify as to till what point in the dog's life they want to know how many races did the dog win.
Do we have to assume that they are asking abt races won before retirement? (I know some of you will shout "ofcourse!")
Shouldnt the question read "How many races did he win till he retired?"
Or, am i overanalyzing a simple question?
Whenever i assume such simple things in DS wrod problems like games won, races won, etc, it turns out normally that I should not have assumed anything though it seemed like commonsense. When i get smart and start not assuming such simple things, they dont like my answers either!
What the hell is going on with me!?