If the operation @ is defined for all integers a and b by a@b = a+b-ab

Question

If the operation  @  is defined for all integers a and b by a@b = a + b - ab, which of the following statements must be true for all integers a, b and c?

I. a@b = b@a
II. a@0 = a
III. (a@b)@c = a@(b@c)

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) I and III only
(E) I, II and III

Bunuel · Accepted Answer

If the operation  @  is defined for all integers a and b by  a@b = a + b - ab , which of the following statements must be true for all integers a, b and c?

I.  a@b = b@a 
II.  a@0 = a 
III.  (a@b)@c = a@(b@c)

(A) I only
(B) II only
(C) I and II only
(D) I and III only
(E) I, II and III

Given that  a@b=a+b-ab , we need to determine which of the options MUST be true.

I.  a@b = b@a :

The left hand side is  a@b=a+b-ab ;
The right hand side is  b@a=b+a-ab .

LHS = RHS. Hence, this option is always true.

II.  a@0 = a :

The left hand side is  a@0=a+0-a*0=a ;
The right hand side is  a .

LHS = RHS. Hence, this option is always true.

III.  (a@b)@c = a@(b@c)

The left hand side is 
 (a@b)@c=a@b+c-(a@b)*c=(a+b-ab)+c-(a+b-ab)c=a+b+c-ab-ac-bc+abc

The right hand side is 
 a@(b@c)=a+b@c-a*(b@c)=a+(b+c-bc)-(b+c-bc)a=a+b+c-bc-ab-ac+abc

LHS = RHS. Hence, this option is always true.

Answer: E.

fozzzy · Answer

You can always test values that's an alternative

Let a=1,b=2 and c=3

Definition => a@b=a+b-ab

Option 3

III. (a@b)@c = a@(b@c)

a@b = 1 + 2 -2 = 1
1@3 = 1+3 -3 = 1

B@c = 2@3 = 5-6 = -1
1@-1 = 1 - 1 - ( -1 * 1)
=1

LHS = RHS

subhashghosh · Answer

(I) and (II) are obviously correct.

For (III)

(a+b-ab)@c = (a + b - ab)@c = a + b - ab + c - c(a + b - ab) = a + b - ab + c - ac - ab + abc

a@(b@c) = a@(b + c - bc) = a + b + c - bc - a(b + c - bc) = a + b + c - bc -ab - ac + abc

Answer - E

fguardini1 · Answer

Sorry for bumping up an old thread, I have a doubt: my approach for solving the question was to assume that the operation in this case was the union between two sets, a and b, and consequently the three points were the properties of the union of sets. Is that a correct approach or might it be too risky in the actual exam? (or is it even a wrong assumption, and I got it right out of luck?)

mbaiseasy · Answer

I. a@b = b@a
 a+b-ab=b+a-ab  TRUE!

II. a@0 = a
 a+0-0 = a  TRUE!

III. (a@b)@c = a@(b@c)
 a+b-ab+c-ac-bc+abc = b+c-bc + a - ab-ac+abc  STRIKE OUT DUPLICATES ON RHS and LHS! TRUE!

Answer: I,II, and III or (E)

Bunuel · Answer

That's not correct. Stem defines some function @ for all integers a and b by a@b=a+b-ab. For example if a=1 and b=2, then a@b=1@2=1+2-1*2.

Hope it's clear.

sianissimo · Answer

Been looking at this for a while and still can't figure it out.. I thought that we must ALWAYS first do the calculations in the brackets and open them, and then do the remaining calculations. as we have a@(b@c), how come do you straight come up to (a + b - ab)@c, when it's b@c in the brackets, not a@b anymore.. finding this one a bit confusing.. thanks for explaining in advance

EDIT: OK, I think I get it now.. pls, have a look at my upload and let me know if I am correct.. this is the left side of the equation in (III). With the right one, we do the exact same thing, right?

jlgdr · Answer

Hey there folks, sorry to bump on an old thread. Just wondering, is there a way to evaluate statement 3 faster?
I believe this questions takes around 2 minutes and evaluating statement 3 takes a lot of work and is prone to errors.

Just wondering if I'm doing this the correct/most efficient way

Thanks guys
Cheers!

J

udso · Answer

In this problem we have been asked to check the commutative and associative property of the given function. These properties are defined as below:

Commutative: In mathematics, a binary operation is commutative if changing the order of the operands does not change the result.

Associative: Within an expression containing two or more occurrences in a row of the same associative operator, the order in which the operations are performed does not matter as long as the sequence of the operands is not changed. That is, rearranging the parentheses in such an expression will not change its value.

If you're wondering if commutativity implies associativity in mathematics then the answer is NO. However, for simple addition and multiplication functions commutativity does imply associativity and hence in such cases option 3 need not be tested if option 1 is true. However, the only way to solve such problems which involve functions other than simple addition and multiplication would be to solve the expression completely as stated above.

jlgdr · Answer

Well, can't argue that learning the definitions is in fact quite interesting and thank you for that.
Nevertheless, I was really intereted in solving statement 3 quicker/faster/more efficient
So, being able to recognize if operations in the different order given will yield same result without having to go through all the long distribution process.

I will try to come up with a faster way but if anyone else come's up with a nice and elegant approach I'd be happy to give some nice Kudos for the collection

Cheers
J

VenoMfTw · Answer

Given: a#b=a+b-ab

(i) a#b=b#a
a#b = a+b-ab 
b#a = b+a-ba --> we can rewrite this as a+b-ab
which is same as a#b. Thus it is true

(ii) a#0=a 
a#0 = a+0-(a*0) = a. Thus true

(iii) (a#b)#c=a#(b#c)
(a#b)#c
Consider a#b = x. Thus (a#b)#c ==> x#c => x+c-(x*c)
Now a#b = x => a+b-ab =x. Sub in the above equation
a+b-ab+c-  = a+b+c-ab-ac-bc+abc--(1)

a#(b#c)
Consider b#c =y. Thus a#(b#c) --> a#y -> a+y-ay
Now b#c=y --> b+c-bc =y. Sub in the above equation
a+b+c-bc-  --> a+b+c-bc-  --> a+b+c-bc-ab-ac+abc --(2)
(1) =(2)
Thus (a#b)#c=a#(b#c) is true.

Hence all are true

Bunuel · Answer

Check functions related questions in our  Special Questions Directory .

Operations/functions defining algebraic/arithmetic expressions 
 Symbols Representing Arithmetic Operation 
 Rounding Functions 
 Various Functions

CrackverbalGMAT · Answer

Solution:

I and II are true as they prove the commutative and identity property of + and *
a + b - ab + c - c(a + b - ab) = a + b - ab + c - ac - ab + abc

In III-
LHS = (a@b)@c = a + b - ab + c - c(a + b - ab)

= a + b - ab + c - ac - bc + abc

= a + b + c - bc -ab - ac + abc

RHS =a@(b@c)=a@(b + c - bc)

= a + b + c - bc - a(b + c - bc)

= a + b + c - bc -ab - ac + abc = LHS  (option e)

Devmitra Sen
GMAT SME

woohoo921 · Answer

my friend,  avigutman

I would love to know how you approach tackling statement 3. I trust that you will show me the way! Unfortunately, I cannot wrap my heard around it despite the expert responses.

avigutman · Answer

woohoo921  The exact placement of parentheses is inconsequential in  a sum  or in  a product , and the operation  is  just  the sum  of two terms minus  their product . So, intuitively, it shouldn't matter. If you know that algebra isn't a strength for you, then your best move here is to guess based on that intuition.
If you're going to try to prove it algebraically, consider not writing down the steps all the way to the end. Start with the parentheses in each side.
LHS: (a+b-ab)@c
RHS: a@(b+c-bc)
Then perform the @ operation for each side, and try to write down the terms in the same order.
LHS: a+b+c-ab-ac-bc+abc
RHS: a+b+c-ab-ac-bc+abc

hloonker · Answer

is it possible to use the number '0' and accordingly - all these options are possible since its asking ' which is possible'

Bunuel · Answer

The question does not ask "which is possible", it asks "which of the following MUST be true".

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

If the operation @ is defined for all integers a and b by a@b = a+b-ab

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Problem Solving (PS) Questions

If the operation @ is defined for all integers a and b by a@b = a+b-ab

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards