Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
I have been searching for material on To & Fro Motion but could not find what I needed. Any help is appreciated.
To & Fro Motion questions are generally approached with the assumption that after meeting once, the two bodies will reach the opposite ends, turn around and meet again. My question is, what if the assumption fails? What if the speed of first body is high enough to reach the end, turn around and meet the second body even before the second body has reached its end?
For example, A and B start from opposite ends. After their first meet, A reaches the end, turns around and passes B before B has reached the end. I have represented the case below.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Hi Shadwal, I understand your concern. Anyway, the difficulty of a question usually depends on the number of unknown you have to calculate, so I can't answer your question directly. Second, I went through several distance-time questions, and I met this type to multilayered question from sources outside the official guide (so it is less likely to see this kind in real GMAT because it usually consumes too much time to solve in only 2 to 3 min.)
To & Fro Motion questions are generally approached with the assumption that after meeting once, the two bodies will reach the opposite ends, turn around and meet again. My question is, what if the assumption fails? What if the speed of first body is high enough to reach the end, turn around and meet the second body even before the second body has reached its end?
For example, A and B start from opposite ends. After their first meet, A reaches the end, turns around and passes B before B has reached the end. I have represented the case below.
How do we identify such cases? What is the best approach for To & Fro Motion questions that takes such cases into account?
Thanks,
Show more
I understand your concern here, but the only valid answer here is "it depends on what the text of the problem says." If a GMAT problem uses this concept (and that's unlikely, unless it's an extremely difficult problem), then the problem will have to either avoid that situation, or make it completely clear what you're supposed to do in that situation.
Part of the testing process that problems go through, before being used officially, involves being used as experimental questions on real GMATs. When a problem is in this stage, the test writers check to make sure that high scorers are consistently getting that problem right. In a situation like the one you describe - where it's ambiguous what you're supposed to do, and there's no clear way to tell - then some high scorers would get one answer (because they did the right math and decided to ignore the second crossing), and other high scorers would get a different answer (because they did the right math and decided to have the people turn around at the second crossing.) So, the problem would be thrown out or rewritten.
In short: don't worry about this - worry about perfecting your technique and speed on easier rates problems instead.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.