Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 19:16 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 19:16
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
littlegirl
Joined: 12 Nov 2014
Last visit: 31 May 2018
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
15
 [4]
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Posts: 126
Kudos: 15
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,044
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
810,476
 [3]
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,476
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
cutegirlsimran
Joined: 22 Feb 2015
Last visit: 16 Jul 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GMAT Date: 04-01-2015
GPA: 3.98
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Alternate solution
Given equation
|m - n| > ||m| - |n||
must be true only when we have m as +ve and n as -ve.

So equation 1 not sufficient
and equation 2 not sufficient

Together 1 and 2
adding 1 and 2 we get
2m > 0 so m is +ve
but we are not clear about n

So Answer is E

Bunuel
I understand the solution provided but as a alternative do we do this question in this way
is the solution I provided is correct?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
littlegirl
Joined: 12 Nov 2014
Last visit: 31 May 2018
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Posts: 126
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank rich and Bunuel so much
User avatar
gmatkiller88
Joined: 06 Mar 2015
Last visit: 07 Jul 2015
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 12
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Is |m - n| > ||m| - |n|| ?

Square both sides (note that we can safely do that since both sides of the inequality are non-negative):

Is \(m^2 -2mn + n^2 > m^2 - 2|mn| + n^2\)?
Is \(|mn| > mn\)?

So, the questions basically asks whether mn is negative.

(1) m + n > 0. Not sufficient.
(2) m - n > 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From above we can get that m is positive but n can be positive as well as negative, thus mn also can be positive as well as negative. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,
From 1+2 statements together, If we add the statements then n gets cancelled and we know that m > 0 and if we subtract the statements m will get cancelled and we can say that n > 0....hence won't these statements together tell us that m and n both are greater than 0??

Could you please help me understand where am I going wrong here? Many thanks.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,728
Own Kudos:
810,476
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,800
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,728
Kudos: 810,476
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
gmatkiller88
Bunuel
Is |m - n| > ||m| - |n|| ?

Square both sides (note that we can safely do that since both sides of the inequality are non-negative):

Is \(m^2 -2mn + n^2 > m^2 - 2|mn| + n^2\)?
Is \(|mn| > mn\)?

So, the questions basically asks whether mn is negative.

(1) m + n > 0. Not sufficient.
(2) m - n > 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From above we can get that m is positive but n can be positive as well as negative, thus mn also can be positive as well as negative. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,
From 1+2 statements together, If we add the statements then n gets cancelled and we know that m > 0 and if we subtract the statements m will get cancelled and we can say that n > 0....hence won't these statements together tell us that m and n both are greater than 0??

Could you please help me understand where am I going wrong here? Many thanks.

For two inequalities, you can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:
If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) --> \(a-c>b-d\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) --> \(3-5<4-1\).

So, we cannot subtract m - n > 0 from m + n > 0..

For more check: inequalities-tips-and-hints-175001.html
User avatar
gmatkiller88
Joined: 06 Mar 2015
Last visit: 07 Jul 2015
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 12
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
gmatkiller88
Bunuel
Is |m - n| > ||m| - |n|| ?

Square both sides (note that we can safely do that since both sides of the inequality are non-negative):

Is \(m^2 -2mn + n^2 > m^2 - 2|mn| + n^2\)?
Is \(|mn| > mn\)?

So, the questions basically asks whether mn is negative.

(1) m + n > 0. Not sufficient.
(2) m - n > 0. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From above we can get that m is positive but n can be positive as well as negative, thus mn also can be positive as well as negative. Not sufficient.

Answer: E.

Hope it's clear.

Hi Bunuel,
From 1+2 statements together, If we add the statements then n gets cancelled and we know that m > 0 and if we subtract the statements m will get cancelled and we can say that n > 0....hence won't these statements together tell us that m and n both are greater than 0??

Could you please help me understand where am I going wrong here? Many thanks.

For two inequalities, you can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions:
If \(a>b\) and \(c<d\) (signs in opposite direction: \(>\) and \(<\)) --> \(a-c>b-d\) (take the sign of the inequality you subtract from).
Example: \(3<4\) and \(5>1\) --> \(3-5<4-1\).

So, we cannot subtract m - n > 0 from m + n > 0..

For more check:

oh ok. Got it....thanks a ton for your quick response and the link....Appreciate...:)
User avatar
Temurkhon
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Last visit: 06 Apr 2019
Posts: 408
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Schools: Cambridge'16
Schools: Cambridge'16
Posts: 408
Kudos: 325
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The property is:

|m|-|n|<=|m-n|, if m and n have one sign both sides equal, but if different they are not equal.

So question is whether m and n have one sign or not

St.1 m+n>0, so m=1, n=3 or m=5, n=-2. Both scenario possible. INSUFF

St.2 m-n>0, so m=3, n=1 or m=3, n=-2. Again both scenario possible. INSUFF

St.1+St.2. Does not make clear, we still have both scenario possible. INSUFF

E
User avatar
littlegirl
Joined: 12 Nov 2014
Last visit: 31 May 2018
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
15
 [2]
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Posts: 126
Kudos: 15
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
xy> x²y ask y <0?

(1) x> y
(2) x> 1
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
13,044
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,044
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi littlegirl,

This question can be solved with a combination of Number Properties and TESTing VALUES. You will have to be thorough with your thinking to get the correct answer.

We're told that (X)(Y) > (X^2)(Y). We're asked if Y < 0. This is a YES/NO question.

First off, from the given inequality, neither X nor Y can equal 0.

Fact 1: X > Y

IF....
X = 2
Y = -1
-2 > -4
The answer to the question is YES.

IF...
X = 1/2
Y = 1/3
1/6 > 1/12
The answer to the question is NO
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT

Fact 2: X > 1

Since X > 1.....X^2 will always be > X
Using the original inequality, we have...
(X)(Y) > (Bigger than X)(Y)

With this restriction, Y CANNOT be positive. Since we also know that Y CANNOT be 0, the only option that's left is for Y to be NEGATIVE EVERY TIME....

eg
IF....
X = 2
Y = -1
-2 > -4
The answer to the question is YES....and is ALWAYS YES.
Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT

Final Answer:
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
masoomdon
Joined: 07 Feb 2015
Last visit: 29 Jun 2015
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 76
Posts: 34
Kudos: 82
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i feel testing values always end up being more time consuming so here's a short way to solve this one.
we have, xy>x2y
rearranging we get,
x2y-xy<0
xy(x-1)<0......(1)
Statement 1 : x>y . it tells us nothing about th sign of x-1 or xy , so INSUFFICIENT
options left : B,C,E
Statement 2 : x>1. so (x-1) > 0 also x>0
hence y <0
SUFFICIENT
User avatar
iamdp
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Last visit: 01 Jul 2016
Posts: 167
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 258
Status:A mind once opened never loses..!
Location: India
MISSION : 800
WE:Design (Manufacturing)
Posts: 167
Kudos: 735
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi

xy - x^2y > 0
xy(1-x) > 0

Now two possible solutions are dr

xy>0 OR 1-x>0 ie x<1

Now from statement one we cannot tell whether y<0

From statement two we know x>1. Therefore solution x<1 is ruled out.
Therefore xy>0 remains

Now either xy are positive of negative but as givwn in statement two x>1 . Therefore y>0
Therefore we get a definite NO
User avatar
littlegirl
Joined: 12 Nov 2014
Last visit: 31 May 2018
Posts: 126
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Posts: 126
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank rich and other friends :-D
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,777
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,777
Kudos: 13,044
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi masoomdon,

One of the great aspects of the GMAT is that the questions are usually designed so that they can be solved in a variety of ways (in that way, you don't have to be a 'math expert' to score at a high level in the Quant section). If you're comfortable doing basic Arithmetic, then TESTing VALUES can be a remarkably straight-forward way to get to the correct answer on most Quant questions. I've worked with Test Takers who were "average" in every conceivable way when they began - but they were able to hit Q49+ on Test Day because they trained and got really good at TESTing VALUES. If you're not practicing IT now though (and building up that skill), then you won't be ready to use it on Test Day (when you will likely *need* it).

For Test Takers who are 'stuck' at a particular scoring level in the Quant and/or have pacing problems in the Quant, the solution almost always involves working on your TESTing VALUES skills.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Problem Solving (PS) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderator:
Math Expert
109728 posts