Hi Username1512,Good catch. You're right that the question
never directly says a≠12 or b≠12. eakabuah's line "ab≠0 means a≠0, b≠0, a≠12, and b≠12" packs two steps into one, and the second step is what's tripping you up.
Here's the split:
-
What ab≠0 says directly: neither factor can be zero, so
a≠0 and
b≠0. That's it - nothing about 12 yet.
-
What the equation adds: a≠12 and b≠12 are not separate given facts - they
follow from combining ab≠0 with a2 + b2 =
144.
Watch how b=
12 gets killed. Plug it into the equation:
- If
b = 12, then b2 =
144, so a2 = 144 − 144 =
0, which forces
a = 0.
- But a = 0 makes ab = 0, and we were told
ab ≠ 0. Contradiction.
So b can't actually
reach12 - the only way to hit
12 is to send the other variable to
0, which is banned. b can get as close as you like (11.99, 11.999...), but never equal
12. Same logic makes a≠12.
Therefore the greatest value of b is
just under 12, landing it in the "between 12 and 3" interval - answer
B.
The key takeaway: the "≠12" isn't stated - it's forced by the equation the moment you refuse to let either variable be zero.
Answer: BUsername1512
I am not sure I understand why a≠12, and b≠12? Any reason for this? I don't see the question specifying this anywhere. Please explain.
Bunuel? Can you please explain?
_________________