Ah, let me try
chetan2uI believe you wrote a whole article on distributing distinct items to distinct groups and the other various forms.....(well-written)
The way the question is written, my interpretation was the following:
First, the teacher is assigning the 6 students to 3 teams. Each team must have at least one student, so there are 3 unique ways to break up the students by number:
[1 , 1 , 4]
[1 , 2 , 3]
[2 , 2 , 2]
For these 3 unique cases of # of ppl per team, we first must find the number of ways to divide the 6 students into 3 teams
Second, we are given and told that “each task will have one team assigned to it.” I read this to mean that once we have determined all the possible ways to divide the students among 3 teams, we must then figure out all the different ways we can assign each team to cover the 3 distinct tasks. (“Shuffling” the 3 teams among the 3 distinct tasks)
3 distinct teams assigned to 3 distinct tasks ——-> 3! = 6 Ways to arrange the teams to the different tasks
Breaking up the students into teams containing at least one student, what follows is the calculation for each case.
Case 1: [1 , 1, 4]
(1st) break up/divide the 6 students into 3 teams that have the following sizes
—-1
—-1
—-4
First, from the 6 students we must choose 4 for one of the teams——> this can be done in “6 choose 4” ways
From the 2 remaining students, we choose 1: “2 choose 1”
Finally, the last one is automatically chosen from the 1 remaining student: “1 choose 1”
[6! / 4! 2!] * [2! / 1! 1!] * [1! / 1! 0!] =
After you cancel Factorials in the NUM/DEN across the expressions, you are left with:
6! / (4! 1! 1!)
However, we have 2 teams that have an identical number of people. We will be over counting as if they are being distributed into distinct teams, when, at this point, we should only be dividing the students into “identical groups.”
Label the 6 students A through F. We will have included in our “over-count” examples such as:
[A , B , C, D]——— [E]———- [F]
and
[A , B , C, D]———[F]———-[E]
Both will be included in the “over-count”, but for purposes of first dividing the students into “identical” teams, these 2 cases should only be counted ONCE
For every 2 cases we counted in our over-count, we only want to actually count 1
We must divide our expression by (2!) to remove this over-counting (now for every 2 cases counted, only 1 will remain)
6! / (4! 1! 1! ) * (1 / 2!) ———-> which is the same as “6 choose 4” ———->
6 * 5 / 2 =
15 ways to divide the students into teams of sizes [4 , 1 , 1]
AND
(2nd)for each one of these 15 ways to create teams, there will be 3 teams of students. We want to determine how many ways we can arrange these 3 teams among the 3 distinct tasks. This can be done in:
3! = 6 ways
15 * 6 = 90 total ways for case 1
Case 2: for the next 2 cases I will just perform the calculations. The logic is similar.
(1st) # of ways to divide students into teams of [1 , 2 , 3]
6! / (3! 2! 1!) = 60 ways
AND
(2nd) for each one of these 60 ways of dividing students into teams of sizes 3, 2, and 1, we need to arrange or “shuffle around” the 3 teams among the 3 distinct tasks. We can do this in:
3! = 6 ways
Case 2 total no. of ways:
60 * 6 = 360 ways
*note*** this is the case in which the other answers are coming up with the 60 possibility. The students are divided among 3 “identical groups” of teams, but then the teams are not arranged among the 3 distinct tasks.
Case 3: [2 , 2 , 2]
(1st) find the # of ways to divide the 6 students into 3 teams of size 2, 2, and 2. Since we have Three teams that have the same number of students, we will have the same over-counting issue explained in case 1. Among the counted examples:
[AB] - [CD] - [EF]
[AB] - [EF] - [CD]
[CD] - [AB] - [EF]
etc.
For purposes of dividing the students into identical teams, each of the examples above are the same and should only be counted once. But for each once of these cases, we have over-counted and actually included 3! = 6 ways
This time, we need to divide by (3!) —- for each 6 cases included in the over-count, we only went to keep 1 in the final count.
6! / (2! 2! 2!) * (1 / 3!) = 15 ways
AND
(2nd) for each of the 15 possibilities of dividing the students into teams, there will be 3 teams of sizes 2, 2, and 2. We need to arrange these 3 teams among 3 distinct tasks. We can do this in:
3! = 6 ways
Case 3 total:
(15) * (6) = 90 ways
Possibilities:
90 ways (case 1)
Or
360 ways (case 2)
Or
90 ways (case 3)
The answer should be A. I only
Am I wrong? Could you kindly point me to where I made a wrong turn?
Thank you for any help.
All the best!
Posted from my mobile device