Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
1. The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiologial responses.
In this question 126 of OG, "that" before comma refers back to "emotional reactions" and not to "individual". The reason we give is "in an individual" is a prepositional phrase and "that" refers back to preceding noun, which is "emotional reactions". Correct??
But 2. In the review of 2000 studies of human behavior that date back to 1940's, two Swiss psychologists, declared that since most of the studies had failed to control for such variables as social class and family size, none could be taken seriously.
In this question as explained earlier:
egmat
Solutions: We asked you to identify the SV pairs in the two official sentences, figure out if there is anything wrong wrt the SV pairs, and if errors are present, how they can be corrected. So here are the answers:
Sentence 1 As you can see, "that" in this sentence is the subject of its clause. It refers to 2,000 studies. All the SV pairs have been identified in green color. The verb has also been underlined. The subject - two swiss psychologists does not have a verb. Declaring should be made into the verb - declared.
Sentence 2 As you can see, there are two occurrences of "that" in this sentence. Both refer to the noun - a work. While first occurrence of "that" acts as the subject of the clause, second occurrence of "that" does not act as the subject. In this clause, the subject is "Samuel Johnson". Note that if we were to write a standalone sentence with just this information related to second clause with that, we would write it as: Samuel Johnson pronounced the work the greatest translation in any language. Coming to the errors - there is no verb for the noun "that". Taking should be changed to "took".
I would like to thank all who posted their responses. Next I will review each response.
Show more
"that" before "date" refers to "2000 studies", but is "of 2000 studies" a prepositional phrase, and hence "that" should ideally refer back to "review" ???
My query now is if there is a "noun+prepositional phrase(containing a noun)" before "that" in a sentence, than what should "that" refer back to. Similarly if there is a "noun+prepositional phrase(containing a noun), " before "which" than what "which" refer back to.
Please anyone explain my query. Thank You
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
My query now is if there is a "noun+prepositional phrase(containing a noun)" before "that" in a sentence, than what should "that" refer back to. Similarly if there is a "noun+prepositional phrase(containing a noun), " before "which" than what "which" refer back to.
Please anyone explain my query. Thank You
Show more
it is not true that if you have a preposition phrase then it(THAT/WHICH) will modify farther noun.. which/THAT always modifies closest noun....except in few cases.
the rule is: Relative Pronouns Modify closest nouns UNLESS – The phrase between modified entity and modifier provides additional information about modified entity – The phrase cannot be placed anywhere else – The phrase does not create any ambiguity in meaning
few examples: I killed the snake,which lived in the burrow behind my house.==>which clearly modifies....SNAKE.
I killed the snake with scales ,which lived in the burrow behind my house.===>here which modifies snake and not the scales...because....above conditions follow here....scales is describing snake....you cannot place anywhere else to make sense correctly.....it doesnot create any ambiguity means.....==>this means scales live behind my house....this doesnt makes sense....
now take other example.: i killed the snake with eggs ,which lay in burrow behind my house......==>here you can see that there is ambiguity....both EGGS and SNAKE can lay in burrow...hence this version of which is wrong....
HOPE IT HELPS
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.