Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
21 Aug 2014, 22:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
Dear friends:
in Manhattan GMAT's sentence correction book (5th edition guide 8, p72), there's this one portion that I simply do not understand:
it's about the usage of ambiguous pronouns:
so this is wrong:
since THEM may refer to packages or executives.
but this is right:
because THEY correctly refer to executives.
I do not understand
how come THEY here won't refer to packages?
in Manhattan GMAT's sentence correction book (5th edition guide 8, p72), there's this one portion that I simply do not understand:
it's about the usage of ambiguous pronouns:
so this is wrong:
Quote:
since THEM may refer to packages or executives.
but this is right:
Quote:
because THEY correctly refer to executives.
I do not understand
how come THEY here won't refer to packages?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
TheFloridian
25 Aug 2014, 15:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
I think I remember coming across this question. The Manhattan SC book does have a few odd question/answers that did not quite make sense to me. Luckily, the actual GMAT (and GMAT Prep) ended up being much more clear cut.
I wouldn't worry about this question too much. You are right; it is ambiguous in both cases. On the real GMAT, if a question is going to come down to pronoun ambiguity alone, it will be much more obvious, even on 700-800 level questions.
I wouldn't worry about this question too much. You are right; it is ambiguous in both cases. On the real GMAT, if a question is going to come down to pronoun ambiguity alone, it will be much more obvious, even on 700-800 level questions.
26 Aug 2014, 14:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
narmfarmer
The real issue here isn't so much about a pronoun potentially referring to multiple nouns (because the GMAT is tolerant of that ambiguity) - it's an issue of switching the relationship of the pronoun within the sentence. The pronouns they & them should refer to the same noun whenever the appear in the sentence. The first example states "how much THEY may have been improperly awarded to THEM". If we replace the pronouns with the same noun the sentence doesn't make sense:
"how much the packages may have been improperly awarded to the packages"
or
"how much the executives may have been improperly awarded to the executives"
The sentence requires a shift between executives and packages in the sentence, so we cannot use a pronoun for both. The second sentence fixes the problem by using only a single pronoun.
KW
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
