Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
asker
Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Last visit: 11 Feb 2016
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
Schools: Anderson '18 (S) Smith '18 (II) McDonough '16 (S) Duke '16 (S) Goizueta '16 (S) Marshall '16 (S) CEIBS '18 (I) Johnson '18 (S) Foster PT'19 (II) McCombs '18
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V28
Schools: Anderson '18 (S) Smith '18 (II) McDonough '16 (S) Duke '16 (S) Goizueta '16 (S) Marshall '16 (S) CEIBS '18 (I) Johnson '18 (S) Foster PT'19 (II) McCombs '18
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V28
Posts: 9
Kudos:
6
02 Nov 2015, 07:10
Kudos
Bookmarks
I have long been confused about this relative phrase. Rules, and also experiences from most questions tell me “that is/that are” is wrong, redundant, wordy, not concise, majority from OG's explanation.
Here are some contradictory examples:
1)
OG13-7, option B and C
"that are" is wrong here.
The same error applied to OG13-28A, OG13-43-C, OG13-60-E(that was), OG13-72-E, OG13-82-C, OG13-83-D, OG13-86-C, OG13-106-E
OK, it seems a perfect rules although there is little tricky on OG13-68.
2)
When I applied the rules to OG13-68, option E, it seems worked at first:
OG said "plan itself cannot do the action of “cut”".
OK. "that are" is wrong here again.
But actually in E, it’s “that are to cut”, so “plans are to”, plans’ object is to do sth, why wrong?
Then, let's look at something else:
3)
Did we just mentioned OG13-86 above? Yes, if we looked at the correct answer OG13-86-B, "a phenomenon THAT IS explained" turned out to be a correct answer!
More importantly,
4) OG13-96-D
"a body of work THAT WAS rooted" is right again!
5) OG16-52-original-sentence
"50 drugs that were advertised" is obviously right since it's not underlined.
6) OG16-137-A
“17 nearby stars that”
I don't know how to understand this contradictory. Can any instructor help to resolve the paradox?
Thanks in advance.
Here are some contradictory examples:
1)
OG13-7, option B and C
"that are" is wrong here.
The same error applied to OG13-28A, OG13-43-C, OG13-60-E(that was), OG13-72-E, OG13-82-C, OG13-83-D, OG13-86-C, OG13-106-E
OK, it seems a perfect rules although there is little tricky on OG13-68.
2)
When I applied the rules to OG13-68, option E, it seems worked at first:
OG said "plan itself cannot do the action of “cut”".
OK. "that are" is wrong here again.
But actually in E, it’s “that are to cut”, so “plans are to”, plans’ object is to do sth, why wrong?
Then, let's look at something else:
3)
Did we just mentioned OG13-86 above? Yes, if we looked at the correct answer OG13-86-B, "a phenomenon THAT IS explained" turned out to be a correct answer!
More importantly,
4) OG13-96-D
"a body of work THAT WAS rooted" is right again!
5) OG16-52-original-sentence
"50 drugs that were advertised" is obviously right since it's not underlined.
6) OG16-137-A
“17 nearby stars that”
I don't know how to understand this contradictory. Can any instructor help to resolve the paradox?
Thanks in advance.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
asker
Joined: 25 Jan 2015
Last visit: 11 Feb 2016
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
Schools: Anderson '18 (S) Smith '18 (II) McDonough '16 (S) Duke '16 (S) Goizueta '16 (S) Marshall '16 (S) CEIBS '18 (I) Johnson '18 (S) Foster PT'19 (II) McCombs '18
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V28
Schools: Anderson '18 (S) Smith '18 (II) McDonough '16 (S) Duke '16 (S) Goizueta '16 (S) Marshall '16 (S) CEIBS '18 (I) Johnson '18 (S) Foster PT'19 (II) McCombs '18
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V28
Posts: 9
Kudos:
6
03 Nov 2015, 12:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
waiting for experts' reply.
It's really an ambiguous issue. Anyone can help on this is highly appreciated.
I do just realized for 4), 5), 6) Verb in the that clause is not just “is” – but rather “is explained", "was rooted” and “were advertised"
It's really an ambiguous issue. Anyone can help on this is highly appreciated.
I do just realized for 4), 5), 6) Verb in the that clause is not just “is” – but rather “is explained", "was rooted” and “were advertised"
06 Jun 2019, 00:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
hi expert,
It's really an ambiguous issue. Anyone can help on this is highly appreciated.
best.
It's really an ambiguous issue. Anyone can help on this is highly appreciated.
best.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
