Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included. Class starts Saturdays Sept. 26, 2026 - Dec. 19, 2026, 1:00pm-4:00pm ES
" Description: Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thur Sept. 29, 2026 - Dec. 3, 2026, 11:00am-1:00pm EST
Welcome to the GMAT Club's Free Interview Prep Event for Top MBA Programs! Buy tickets - Virtual series that’s all set to equip you to -excel in your MBA interviews.
I have long been confused about this relative phrase. Rules, and also experiences from most questions tell me “that is/that are” is wrong, redundant, wordy, not concise, majority from OG's explanation.
Here are some contradictory examples: 1) OG13-7, option B and C "that are" is wrong here. The same error applied to OG13-28A, OG13-43-C, OG13-60-E(that was), OG13-72-E, OG13-82-C, OG13-83-D, OG13-86-C, OG13-106-E
OK, it seems a perfect rules although there is little tricky on OG13-68.
2) When I applied the rules to OG13-68, option E, it seems worked at first: OG said "plan itself cannot do the action of “cut”". OK. "that are" is wrong here again. But actually in E, it’s “that are to cut”, so “plans are to”, plans’ object is to do sth, why wrong?
Then, let's look at something else: 3) Did we just mentioned OG13-86 above? Yes, if we looked at the correct answer OG13-86-B, "a phenomenon THAT IS explained" turned out to be a correct answer!
More importantly, 4) OG13-96-D "a body of work THAT WAS rooted" is right again!
5) OG16-52-original-sentence "50 drugs that were advertised" is obviously right since it's not underlined.
6) OG16-137-A “17 nearby stars that”
I don't know how to understand this contradictory. Can any instructor help to resolve the paradox?
Thanks in advance.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
hi expert, It's really an ambiguous issue. Anyone can help on this is highly appreciated. best.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.