Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
Originally posted by Hero8888 on 03 Jul 2018, 07:45.
Last edited by Hero8888 on 13 Jul 2018, 22:04, edited 5 times in total.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NYT is one of the recommended sources by GCLUB experts to improve SC. But I have some doubts about grammatical constructions it uses. Dear experts, please clarify this situation, thanks.
From the same New York Times' article:
Gabriel’s family, (1)who live in rural southwestern Pennsylvania, (2)have private health insurance but rely on Medicaid to pay for treatments for Abby that her insurance doesn’t cover
(1) Relative pronoun "who" reffers to "famaly". Shouldn't it be correct to say The 's family "which"? (2) In American English collective nouns (except police and a couple of other) are singular. Why plural here?
Another one from NYT:
The organization argued that Asian-American students were particularly victimized by race “quotas (1),” that were once used to exclude Jewish people.
(1) Why the COMMA precedes the restrictive clause with "that"?
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
NYT is one of the recommended sources by GCLUB experts to improve SC. But I have some doubts about grammatical constructions it uses. Dear experts, please clarify this situation, thanks.
From a New York Times' article:
(1)Besides volunteering on local Democratic campaigns, she’s working to coordinate volunteers across campaigns[b],(2) to make sure they’re deployed to the candidates who most need help
(1) GMAT doesn't like preposition+[noun]+participle. But Magoosh says that if we can omit simple pronoun + be verb, then it is acceptable. Okay, that one I can understand, but this one: (2) COMMA + to make. Is it correct?
From the same New York Times' article:
Gabriel’s family, (1)who live in rural southwestern Pennsylvania, (2)have private health insurance but rely on Medicaid to pay for treatments for Abby that her insurance doesn’t cover
(1) Relative pronoun "who" reffers to "famaly". Shouldn't it be correct to say The 's family "which"? (2) In American English collective nouns (except police and a couple of other) are singular. Why plural here?
Show more
Hi Hero8888,
In the second sentence, as a non native speaker, I believe, you have identified the errors correctly.
Something what the GMAT doesn't prefer, isn't always wrong. For instance, usage of 'being' - Being is passive and makes the sentence wordy, it is not preferred on the GMAT but is absolutely fine. I think NYT can help you with correcting your idioms and maybe some other stuff, that i can't think of right now. and As far as i remember from the magoosh lessons, i have seen only a couple of questions with that structure in the first sentence - preposition+[noun]+participle. I lookout for this structure when the preposition is WITH. I have never seen any Official GMAT question that doesn't start with 'WITH' + Noun + participle when one considers this structure. Its best to wait for Experts.
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.