Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1312:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
May 1401:00 AM EDT
-02:00 AM EDT
Looking for your GMAT motivation to break through the score plateau? Pragati improved her score by massive 160 points with strategic guidance and hard-work! Find out how personalized mentorship and a strong mindset can turn GMAT struggles into success.
May 1506:00 PM PDT
-07:00 PM PDT
Start your free trial!
02 Feb 2005, 10:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Since a sambhar, a large, horned Asiatic deer, with no horn is worthless to poachers, the Wildlife Protection Committee plans to protect selected sambhars from being killed by poachers by cutting off their horns.
The Wildlife Protection Committee’s plan assumes that
(A) poachers do not kill sambhars for any reason other than to obtain their horn
(B) hornless sambhars pose less of a threat to humans, including poachers, than do sambhars that have horns
(C) sambhars are the only animals poachers kill for their horns
(D) hornless sambhars can successfully defend their young against non-human predators
(E) imposing more stringent penalties on poachers will not decrease the number of sambhars killed by poachers
The Wildlife Protection Committee’s plan assumes that
(A) poachers do not kill sambhars for any reason other than to obtain their horn
(B) hornless sambhars pose less of a threat to humans, including poachers, than do sambhars that have horns
(C) sambhars are the only animals poachers kill for their horns
(D) hornless sambhars can successfully defend their young against non-human predators
(E) imposing more stringent penalties on poachers will not decrease the number of sambhars killed by poachers
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
03 Feb 2005, 09:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
I will go with ‘A’
‘B’ – Out of context
‘C’ – Discussion is only about sambhars, so out of context.
‘D’ – Out of context
‘E’ – This cannot be directly assumed unless we assume that there is already penalties in place.
‘B’ – Out of context
‘C’ – Discussion is only about sambhars, so out of context.
‘D’ – Out of context
‘E’ – This cannot be directly assumed unless we assume that there is already penalties in place.
