Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Stuck at the same GMAT score? Plateaus aren’t about effort—they’re about approach. Watch Srikar’s journey to uncover what truly drives score improvement—and how you can apply it to break your plateau.
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
75%
(01:43)
correct 25%
(00:36)
wrong
based on 4
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Politician: Suppose censorship is wrong in itself, as modern liberals tend to believe. Then an actor’s refusing a part in a film because the film glamorizes a point of view abhorrent to the actor would be morally wrong. But this conclusion is absurd. It follows that censorship is not, after all, wrong in itself. The reasoning in the politician’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that this argument (A) presumes, without providing justification, that actors would subscribe to any tenet of modern liberalism (B) uses the term “liberal” in order to discredit opponents’ point of view (C) takes for granted that there is a moral obligation to practice one’s profession (D) draws a conclusion that is inconsistent with a premise it accepts (E) presumes, without providing justification, that declining a film role constitutes censorship in the relevant sense
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.