Among these two samples, S1 had the greater ratio of total number of ___1___ to total number of ___2___.
In order to get any ration (A/B) to be as great as possible, we need to maximize the numerator (A) and minimize the denominator (B). In the prompt, we can only know for a fact that S1 has
more spores and
fewer number of species than does S2. So
spores goes to blank 1, and
number of species presented goes to blank 2.
Here is the fun part, the GMAT would always try to pull some mind trap if you are not careful. Here are some of the traps that came up in my mind before getting discarded.
S1 had the greater total number of spores, and it contained pollen grains from Species P as well as spores from Species Q. 1. Does S1 only have grains from Species P and spores from Species Q? No, it could have something else, i.e. grains from Species Z.
2. Does S1 only have Species P and Q? No, we just know Species P and Q are in the set, and do not know about other species.
3. Does S1 have more Species Q's spore than that in S2? No, we don't know. Might be the case that Species Q only accounts for a very small amount of total number of species in S1.
S2 had the greater total number of species represented, and all of the spores it contained were from Species Q.1. Does that mean S2 has less species Q's pores than does S1? We don't know. It might be the case that Q's pore from S2 is more than that in S1 while the total of number of spores in S2 is still less than that in S1 (because S1 may have a lot more spores from other species as well)
2. Does that mean S2 only have species Q? No, because it is explicitly stated that S2 has more species than S1, so at the minimum S2 has 3 species (because S1 already has species P and Q)