Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
22 Apr 2021, 20:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Chiara's Round 3 score was 43.: Not Consistent
Chiara's Round 3 score was 58.: Consistent
Chiara won the game.: Not Consistent
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
84% (02:25) correct
16%
(02:25)
wrong
based on 1341
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Four friends—Amelie, Benedikt, Chiara, and Dominic—played four rounds of a card game together. In each round, each player scored a positive integer number of points. The number of points each player scored in each round is recorded in the table, except for Chiara's score in Round 3, which the scorekeeper forgot to record and is represented by x. The winner of the game was the player whose total score (the sum of the scores for all 4 rounds) was greatest.
The friends correctly remember that Chiara scored the greatest number of points among the 4 friends in exactly 2 of the 4 rounds, and she scored a greater number of points in Round 3 than she did in each of the other 3 rounds. The position of x and x + 154 in the table sorts does not indicate anything about their values.
For each of the following statements, select Consistent if the statement is consistent with the information provided. Otherwise, select Not consistent.
The friends correctly remember that Chiara scored the greatest number of points among the 4 friends in exactly 2 of the 4 rounds, and she scored a greater number of points in Round 3 than she did in each of the other 3 rounds. The position of x and x + 154 in the table sorts does not indicate anything about their values.
| Player | Round 1 | Round 2 | Round 3 | Round 4 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amelie | 23 | 46 | 25 | 38 | 132 |
| Benedikt | 47 | 52 | 61 | 65 | 225 |
| Chiara | 51 | 55 | x | 48 | x + 154 |
| Dominic | 21 | 53 | 55 | 41 | 170 |
For each of the following statements, select Consistent if the statement is consistent with the information provided. Otherwise, select Not consistent.
| Consistent | Not Consistent | |
| Chiara's Round 3 score was 43. | ||
| Chiara's Round 3 score was 58. | ||
| Chiara won the game. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Chiara's Round 3 score was 43.: Not Consistent
Chiara's Round 3 score was 58.: Consistent
Chiara won the game.: Not Consistent
23 Apr 2021, 00:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
Sajjad1994
Quote:
She has scored the highest points in Round 1 and round 2, so she should have scored less than 61, which is the highest in round 3.
Quote:
So she should have scored >55
The range of x = 55<x<61
Total of Chiara is 55+154<x+154<61+154 => 209<x+154<215
| Consistent | Not Consistent | |
| Yes | Chiara's Round 3 score was 43. | |
| Chiara's Round 3 score was 58. | ||
| Yes | Chiara won the game. |
08 Dec 2023, 04:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
If the stem had said the Chiara's score COULD BE 58, it would have been consistent but it is saying that her score was 58, I don't think this is consistent. Please help GMATNinja
chetan2u
