Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
81%
(01:36)
correct 19%
(01:59)
wrong
based on 703
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Two water polo teams, Team X and Team Y, play a game against each other once at the end of each year. Because ties are not allowed, exactly one of the teams wins each of these games. For each of 20 weeks leading up to this year’s game, an analyst gave an estimated probability that Team X would win the game against Team Y, based on the two teams’ performances in other games during that period. The graph shows the analyst’s estimated probability for each week.
Select from the drop-down menus the options that create the statements that most accurately reflect the information provided.
The analyst estimated that Team X was more likely to win the game than Team Y for exactly of the 20 weeks shown in the graph.
Among the weeks shown in the graph, for the week that the analyst estimated Team X would have the least probability of winning the game, the analyst’s estimate for that week implies Team Y would have a percent chance of winning the game, to the nearest 10 percent.
Trying to understand why the right answer is right?
GMAT Club Tests explanations walk through concepts, shortcuts, and common traps on many questions.
See how →
For first question, you should count the number 'o' out of 20 as it represents the Team X probability i.e., 8.
For second question, Team X lowest probability is on Week 20 i.e., 30%. If Team X's probability is 30% then Team Y's probability would be (100-30) = 70%
Hi, for the question 2, did you mean Week 15 for the lowest probability? (30%) Also, for week 20, we can infer it's 55%. Just making sure! Thanks
PavanV1
For first question, you should count the number 'o' out of 20 as it represents the Team X probability i.e., 8.
For second question, Team X lowest probability is on Week 20 i.e., 30%. If Team X's probability is 30% then Team Y's probability would be (100-30) = 70%
You are right . It has to be week 15. But I am not sure about the notations. KarishmaB
hchiaki
Hi, for the question 2, did you mean Week 15 for the lowest probability? (30%) Also, for week 20, we can infer it's 55%. Just making sure! Thanks
PavanV1
For first question, you should count the number 'o' out of 20 as it represents the Team X probability i.e., 8.
For second question, Team X lowest probability is on Week 20 i.e., 30%. If Team X's probability is 30% then Team Y's probability would be (100-30) = 70%
There are 20 ticks on x-axis, so each axis talks of 1 game. To avoid congesting the graph, they have marked every alterante tick 2,4,6 and so on. That is perfectly fine and nothing is missing here.
The graph could have had every 5th tick marked, tha tis 5, 10, 15 and 20
There are 20 ticks on x-axis, so each axis talks of 1 game. To avoid congesting the graph, they have marked every alterante tick 2,4,6 and so on. That is perfectly fine and nothing is missing here.
The graph could have had every 5th tick marked, tha tis 5, 10, 15 and 20[/quote]
Two water polo teams, Team X and Team Y, play a game against each other once at the end of each year. Because ties are not allowed, exactly one of the teams wins each of these games. For each of 20 weeks leading up to this year’s game, an analyst gave an estimated probability that Team X would win the game against Team Y, based on the two teams’ performances in other games during that period. The graph shows the analyst’s estimated probability for each week.
Select from the drop-down menus the options that create the statements that most accurately reflect the information provided.
The analyst estimated that Team X was more likely to win the game than Team Y for exactly of the 20 weeks shown in the graph.
Among the weeks shown in the graph, for the week that the analyst estimated Team X would have the least probability of winning the game, the analyst’s estimate for that week implies Team Y would have a percent chance of winning the game, to the nearest 10 percent.
The notations are fine in the question and I think in fact they make the calculations easier. X axis shows week 1, week 2 etc and each has a corresponding value on the Y axis of the probability of team X winning over team Y. So in week 1 there was a 67% probability that team X will win over Y, in week 2 it fell to about 62% etc.
The analyst estimated that Team X was more likely to win the game than Team Y for exactly _______ of the 20 weeks shown in the graph.
The 50% probability mark has a thick line separating the graph into two sections. The points above it (no fill circles but solid line) are different from the points below it (solid circles but dashed lines). So team X was more likely to win (probability more than 50%) for all points above this line. We have 8 such points.
Among the weeks shown in the graph, for the week that the analyst estimated Team X would have the least probability of winning the game, the analyst’s estimate for that week implies Team Y would have a ____ percent chance of winning the game, to the nearest 10 percent.
Team X has least probability in week 15 which is exactly at 30% point. So team Y has a 70% probability of winning at that time.
there is no labelling given for the black solid dots versus the white empty dots, same for the black line vs the blue line so its just to make our jobs easier to distinguish <50% and 50%< probabilities ? because i was thrown off by why no label is provided for different colors.