Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 3001:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2912:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
May 0306:30 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
texigan
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Last visit: 10 Mar 2018
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: Jones '15 (A$)
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GPA: 3.94
15 Sep 2012, 17:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello everyone, this is my second post ever on this forum (First was the creation of the 2013 Jones thread, join me on it!)
Anyways, I took my GMAT in March of 2011, so it was quite a long time ago; hopefully my story can help you guys out. I think the test changed since, but I think some of my anecdotes will generalize to the revised test.
I spent about 2 months studying. My theory is, it's not about how long you study or even how many hours a day you study, its about knowing how to study. In my personal case, I am a quant guy so I spent most of my time on the verbal section. When I took the exam, it was Reading, Logic, Sentences. I'l take each part separately:
Reading: It's hard to "learn" how to read faster, but it is easy to DISCIPLINE yourself into becoming a more focused reader. I can't stress how key this is. You do not have to speedread to beat the gmat; however, the student who has to read sentences multiple times because he loss focus is in big trouble. I recommend reading a book or two or more in the month before taking the gmat. This will get your mind accustomed to focus on reading and will give you an inside edge at control of your own mind's focus. Now, on to the questions. Take Practice Tests and take a LOT of them. If you get a question wrong, don't tell yourself the answer is "wrong". It's not telling you your dumb, it's telling you that you are making improper inferences. DONT INFER UNLESS THE QUESTION TELLS YOU TO INFER. You want to pick the answer that is the most painfully obvious from the text. Thus, although it may seem like a good thing if you know the
subject you are reading about, it is most often not. I thought I was golden everytime the passage on the practice tests were about chemistry because that is my study, but I most often got the most wrong on passages like this. Don't let your own knowledge infringe on the material that you will be asked about. There will only be one choice that is completely accurate and not a logical leap. Pick that one and move on to the nextquestion. And don't read choice a, read choiceb, read choice c, like choice c, and pick choice c. Read all the choices.. easy to say but in practice this takes discipline.
Logic: Much of the same strategy as reading, but here you have to infer. Again, read all the choices. Many of them may seem correct. In reality, more than one of the answers may be correct. However, there is one that can be inferred directly from the material. If one choice follows from the material and violates common sense and the other requires common sense to infer, Go with the first choice! Keep your logic linear... Keep track of all teh inputs required in your logic to reach a position. If one of the inputs is not in the text.. that answer is Wrong!
Sentences: Learn the rules. Learn the rules. Learn the rules. They are going to try to trick you with long drawn out sentences with complex clauses. In math, we use paranthesis to separate things. For example, sin5x would look better if we wrote sin(5x). In sentences, you should do the same thought process. For example:
"Each of the scientists have a computer". This sentence is WRONG. Know why? Think of it like this:
"(Each of the engineers) have a computer". The subject in paranthesis is referring to a singular person.
"(Person) have a computer". Now it is clear that this is wrong:
"(Person) HAS a computer" --> "Each of the scientists has a computer" is the correct sentence.
Besides this, focus on parallelism and idioms... those are key.
As far as the AWA goes, keep the logic linear and maintain a structure... that is what they look for.
And for the quant: Work fast but at every logical step you make, quickly ask yourself, "is this logically correct?". Then, when you get to the end, you will not have to worry about getting the problem wrong, because you evaluated every step. Half of your brain should be in problem solving mode, and the other half should be in editing mode. This is not the math test where a simple mistake is forgiven. At least in my day, the CAT meant that getting 2 questions wrong early killed your high score.
I'm sorry I'm not more specific... I'm more just relaying the realizations I made on my path to the test taking environment. It's definitely an intimidating process, but I wish you all the best of luck.
-Texigan
Anyways, I took my GMAT in March of 2011, so it was quite a long time ago; hopefully my story can help you guys out. I think the test changed since, but I think some of my anecdotes will generalize to the revised test.
I spent about 2 months studying. My theory is, it's not about how long you study or even how many hours a day you study, its about knowing how to study. In my personal case, I am a quant guy so I spent most of my time on the verbal section. When I took the exam, it was Reading, Logic, Sentences. I'l take each part separately:
Reading: It's hard to "learn" how to read faster, but it is easy to DISCIPLINE yourself into becoming a more focused reader. I can't stress how key this is. You do not have to speedread to beat the gmat; however, the student who has to read sentences multiple times because he loss focus is in big trouble. I recommend reading a book or two or more in the month before taking the gmat. This will get your mind accustomed to focus on reading and will give you an inside edge at control of your own mind's focus. Now, on to the questions. Take Practice Tests and take a LOT of them. If you get a question wrong, don't tell yourself the answer is "wrong". It's not telling you your dumb, it's telling you that you are making improper inferences. DONT INFER UNLESS THE QUESTION TELLS YOU TO INFER. You want to pick the answer that is the most painfully obvious from the text. Thus, although it may seem like a good thing if you know the
subject you are reading about, it is most often not. I thought I was golden everytime the passage on the practice tests were about chemistry because that is my study, but I most often got the most wrong on passages like this. Don't let your own knowledge infringe on the material that you will be asked about. There will only be one choice that is completely accurate and not a logical leap. Pick that one and move on to the nextquestion. And don't read choice a, read choiceb, read choice c, like choice c, and pick choice c. Read all the choices.. easy to say but in practice this takes discipline.
Logic: Much of the same strategy as reading, but here you have to infer. Again, read all the choices. Many of them may seem correct. In reality, more than one of the answers may be correct. However, there is one that can be inferred directly from the material. If one choice follows from the material and violates common sense and the other requires common sense to infer, Go with the first choice! Keep your logic linear... Keep track of all teh inputs required in your logic to reach a position. If one of the inputs is not in the text.. that answer is Wrong!
Sentences: Learn the rules. Learn the rules. Learn the rules. They are going to try to trick you with long drawn out sentences with complex clauses. In math, we use paranthesis to separate things. For example, sin5x would look better if we wrote sin(5x). In sentences, you should do the same thought process. For example:
"Each of the scientists have a computer". This sentence is WRONG. Know why? Think of it like this:
"(Each of the engineers) have a computer". The subject in paranthesis is referring to a singular person.
"(Person) have a computer". Now it is clear that this is wrong:
"(Person) HAS a computer" --> "Each of the scientists has a computer" is the correct sentence.
Besides this, focus on parallelism and idioms... those are key.
As far as the AWA goes, keep the logic linear and maintain a structure... that is what they look for.
And for the quant: Work fast but at every logical step you make, quickly ask yourself, "is this logically correct?". Then, when you get to the end, you will not have to worry about getting the problem wrong, because you evaluated every step. Half of your brain should be in problem solving mode, and the other half should be in editing mode. This is not the math test where a simple mistake is forgiven. At least in my day, the CAT meant that getting 2 questions wrong early killed your high score.
I'm sorry I'm not more specific... I'm more just relaying the realizations I made on my path to the test taking environment. It's definitely an intimidating process, but I wish you all the best of luck.
-Texigan
16 Sep 2012, 08:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
Really well written debrief and an awesome score!Can you please answer my below queries:
What kind of questions did u encounter during the exam,especially in quant.Which topics u feel one should stress more on in quant?
Do u think the level of difficulty was the same as that of gmatprep exam?
Thanks,
Shreeraj
What kind of questions did u encounter during the exam,especially in quant.Which topics u feel one should stress more on in quant?
Do u think the level of difficulty was the same as that of gmatprep exam?
Thanks,
Shreeraj
16 Sep 2012, 13:08
Kudos
Bookmarks
shreerajp99
Thanks Shreeraj,
Although i am not your best source of info for studying for quant (again, quant was my natural area, verbal was my sticking point), i think I can help you a little bit.
First of all, yes, I found that the level of difficulty was roughly the same.. If you feel confident on the 700+ questions in practice tests than you will be fine on teh hardest GMAT questions.
Here are a few things that I came across in my preparation and or exam:
1) The research/non-counted/test-question questions WILL throw you off. In my case, my questions kept getting progressively harder until what seemed like a softball was thrown my way. Obviously, my first reaction was to bleieve that it was a trick question. You should ask yourself if it really is a trick, but don't overthink it. You want to answer the easy ones that appear out of place just as if they are in fact easy. Don't overthink it. This will save you big time when you do get to the harder questions.
2) Study primarily with 700+/Hardest questions. These will get you acquainted with the logic used in the number theory and geometry questions (areas where just about nobody has real experience in). For example, as a physicist and a chemist, I am used to dealing with complex calculus and high level math, so it was a bit humbling to have to study number theory and geometry formulas. But It all worked out in the end for me.
Hope I helped.
