It is currently 14 Dec 2017, 00:30

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 19

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2009, 02:18
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

62% (00:40) correct 38% (01:43) wrong based on 31 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 19

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2009
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

Re: We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2009, 10:52
"B"

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 9

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2009
Posts: 8

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2009, 13:46
I will say E, please post OA.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Expert Post
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 644

Kudos [?]: 308 [0], given: 2

Location: Cambridge, MA
Re: We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2009, 20:42
"we commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term, they are" supports B.

A is unsupported. We know critics "often" disagree, but that doesn't necessarily apply to any of these particular artists.
C discusses reputation, which is out of the scope of aesthetic value; it also mentions fluctuation, out of scope once more.
D is out of the scope; we don't discuss works that have "endured" for centuries, only works that have "delighted" for centuries.
E is a distortion, and also a 180. The prompt tells us that works that have delighted for centuries can be called great; we know nothing about modern works except that they ARE subjective (as the quote above showed).
_________________

Eli Meyer
Kaplan Teacher
http://www.kaptest.com/GMAT

Prepare with Kaplan and save $150 on a course!

Image

Kaplan Reviews

Kudos [?]: 308 [0], given: 2

1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 30 [1], given: 3

Schools: Wharton, Kellogg, Duke (Health care management)
Re: We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Nov 2009, 10:15
1
This post received
KUDOS
raven678 wrote:
We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.



+1 for B.
The paragraph states that aesthetic judgments on contemporary art are subjective in short term, but the subjectivity disappears with time (centuries in the case of the examples given). this leads to B

Kudos [?]: 30 [1], given: 3

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2009
Posts: 53

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 19

Re: We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Nov 2009, 13:28
speeddeamon wrote:
raven678 wrote:
We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and in the short term they are, since critics often disagree about the value of a particular contemporary work of art. But over time, the subjective element disappears. When works of art have continued to delight audiences for centuries, as have the paintings of Michelangelo, the music of Bach, and the plays of Shakespeare, we can objectively call them great.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) When Michelangelo, Bach, and Shakespeare were alive, critics disagreed about the value of their work.
(B) The value of a contemporary work of art cannot be objectively measured.
(C) The reputation of a work of art often fluctuates greatly from one generation to the next.
(D) The mere fact that a work of art has endured for centuries does not establish its greatness.
(E) If critics agree about the value of a particular cotemporary work of art, then the work can objectively be called great.



+1 for B.
The paragraph states that aesthetic judgments on contemporary art are subjective in short term, but the subjectivity disappears with time (centuries in the case of the examples given). this leads to B


The OA is B. Good Explanation. Thanks :-D

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 19

SVP
SVP
avatar
Status: Graduated
Affiliations: HEC
Joined: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 1634

Kudos [?]: 690 [0], given: 432

Concentration: Economics, Finance
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V44
Premium Member
Re: We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Nov 2009, 10:38
Speeddeamon hit the nail right on the head. The answer is B.
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 690 [0], given: 432

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Feb 2011
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Mar 2011, 23:16
nice work ele meyer. nicely explained

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments   [#permalink] 12 Mar 2011, 23:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

We commonly speak of aesthetic judgments as subjective, and

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.