Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 12:51 It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 12:51
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
User avatar
paoletto03
User avatar
Joined: 04 Dec 2025
Last visit: 07 Mar 2026
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
GRE 1: Q155 V161
GRE 1: Q155 V161
Posts: 6
Kudos: 2
 [1]
What aspect of the profile matters more? 23 Dec 2025, 11:02
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For MiM programs at schools like ESSEC what area of applicants' profiles weighs more? Are they truly as holistic as they say or do they have implicit cutoff scores for gpa and gre below which you wouldn't be able to get admitted? I personally believe that work experience, career goals, narrative and fit with the school matter considerably more than gpa or test scores since a mim degree is made exclusively to place students for jobs; moreover no European schools posts academics ranking as in average gpa or gmat (for the most part) so the only way these schools climb the rankings is through employability stats. But is that actually the case?
User avatar
YashasBM007
User avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2025
Last visit: 17 Aug 2026
Posts: 7
Given Kudos: 1,364
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
What aspect of the profile matters more? 25 Dec 2025, 03:36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1

paoletto03
For MiM programs at schools like ESSEC what area of applicants' profiles weighs more? Are they truly as holistic as they say or do they have implicit cutoff scores for gpa and gre below which you wouldn't be able to get admitted? I personally believe that work experience, career goals, narrative and fit with the school matter considerably more than gpa or test scores since a mim degree is made exclusively to place students for jobs; moreover no European schools posts academics ranking as in average gpa or gmat (for the most part) so the only way these schools climb the rankings is through employability stats. But is that actually the case?
Show more
User avatar
dotsoftme
User avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2022
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 284
Own Kudos:
74
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 284
Kudos: 74
 [1]
What aspect of the profile matters more? 25 Dec 2025, 05:16
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Your intuition is remarkably close to the reality of European MiM admissions, though there are a few "hidden" mechanics at play regarding how schools like ESSEC balance their "holistic" promise with the pressure of rankings.
To understand the weightage, it helps to view the application as a two-stage filter: Academic Eligibility (The "Can you do the work?" check) and Personal Fit (The "Will you get hired and represent us well?" check).
1. The "Implicit Cutoff" Reality
While ESSEC and its peers (HEC, ESCP, LBS) rarely publish a hard "rejection floor," there are functional floors dictated by the competitive nature of the applicant pool.
  • The GMAT/GRE "Safety Net": You are correct that employability drives rankings, but Selectivity (average GMAT and acceptance rate) is also a core component of the Financial Times and QS rankings. For ESSEC, the average GMAT is typically around 660-680.
  • The "Automatic" Rejection: While a 600 GMAT won't get you "auto-rejected" by a computer, it puts immense pressure on the rest of your profile. If you have a score below 630-640, the admissions committee (AdCom) begins to doubt your ability to handle the rigorous quantitative core, regardless of how "fit" you are for the culture.
  • GPA Nuance: European schools are often more forgiving of GPA than US schools because they understand the grading variances between, say, a top Indian IIT, a British "First Class," and a French "Mention Très Bien." They look for academic consistency rather than just a single number.
[hr]
2. What Actually Weighs More?
Once you clear the "academic hurdle" (roughly 30-40% of the weight), the focus shifts entirely to what you identified: Employability and Narrative.
Profile AreaEstimated WeightWhy it matters at ESSEC
Test Scores (GMAT/GRE)20-25%A "sanity check" for rigor and a ranking booster.
Undergrad GPA/Reputation15-20%Evidence of long-term discipline.
Professional Experience25-30%Includes internships and "Chaire" (specialized track) potential.
Motivation & Goals (Fit)30%ESSEC is known for its "pioneer spirit." They want "doers."
3. The "Employability" Ranking Driver
You hit the nail on the head: European schools are obsessed with Salary Increase and Placement Rate because these carry the most weight in the Financial Times rankings.
Because of this, AdCom asks: "If I admit this person, can I place them at McKinsey, Goldman Sachs, or L’Oréal in 2 years?" * The Narrative: If your goals are "I want to explore business," you are a risk. If your goals are "I have 3 internships in VC and I want to join a Tier-1 firm in Paris/Singapore," you are an asset to their future ranking.
  • Work Experience: Even though MiMs are for "pre-experience" students, "pre-experience" at ESSEC usually means 2-3 high-quality internships. An applicant with a 720 GMAT but zero internships is often less attractive than a 660 GMAT with internships at blue-chip companies.
4. Is it Truly Holistic?
Yes, but with a caveat: Holistic does not mean "Average."
It means they are willing to trade a weakness in one area for an exceptional strength in another.
  • Low GMAT? You better have a "Blue Chip" internship or a successful startup.
  • Low GPA? Your GMAT needs to be 700+ to prove the GPA was due to lack of interest, not lack of ability.
  • Non-Business Background? They love architects, engineers, and philosophers, but you must explain why you need management skills now to achieve a specific goal.
Summary
You are right that fit and employability are the ultimate deciders, but the test scores act as the "entry ticket." Think of the GMAT/GPA as the ticket that gets you into the room, and your narrative/internships as the tools that actually win you the seat.

paoletto03
For MiM programs at schools like ESSEC what area of applicants' profiles weighs more? Are they truly as holistic as they say or do they have implicit cutoff scores for gpa and gre below which you wouldn't be able to get admitted? I personally believe that work experience, career goals, narrative and fit with the school matter considerably more than gpa or test scores since a mim degree is made exclusively to place students for jobs; moreover no European schools posts academics ranking as in average gpa or gmat (for the most part) so the only way these schools climb the rankings is through employability stats. But is that actually the case?
Show more
User avatar
YashasBM007
User avatar
Joined: 28 Aug 2025
Last visit: 17 Aug 2026
Posts: 7
Given Kudos: 1,364
Posts: 7
Kudos: 0
What aspect of the profile matters more? 25 Dec 2025, 09:11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you for this insight Darshit!
iamdarshitgupta
Your intuition is remarkably close to the reality of European MiM admissions, though there are a few "hidden" mechanics at play regarding how schools like ESSEC balance their "holistic" promise with the pressure of rankings.
To understand the weightage, it helps to view the application as a two-stage filter: Academic Eligibility (The "Can you do the work?" check) and Personal Fit (The "Will you get hired and represent us well?" check).
1. The "Implicit Cutoff" Reality
While ESSEC and its peers (HEC, ESCP, LBS) rarely publish a hard "rejection floor," there are functional floors dictated by the competitive nature of the applicant pool.
  • The GMAT/GRE "Safety Net": You are correct that employability drives rankings, but Selectivity (average GMAT and acceptance rate) is also a core component of the Financial Times and QS rankings. For ESSEC, the average GMAT is typically around 660-680.
  • The "Automatic" Rejection: While a 600 GMAT won't get you "auto-rejected" by a computer, it puts immense pressure on the rest of your profile. If you have a score below 630-640, the admissions committee (AdCom) begins to doubt your ability to handle the rigorous quantitative core, regardless of how "fit" you are for the culture.
  • GPA Nuance: European schools are often more forgiving of GPA than US schools because they understand the grading variances between, say, a top Indian IIT, a British "First Class," and a French "Mention Très Bien." They look for academic consistency rather than just a single number.
[hr]
2. What Actually Weighs More?
Once you clear the "academic hurdle" (roughly 30-40% of the weight), the focus shifts entirely to what you identified: Employability and Narrative.
Profile AreaEstimated WeightWhy it matters at ESSEC
Test Scores (GMAT/GRE)20-25%A "sanity check" for rigor and a ranking booster.
Undergrad GPA/Reputation15-20%Evidence of long-term discipline.
Professional Experience25-30%Includes internships and "Chaire" (specialized track) potential.
Motivation & Goals (Fit)30%ESSEC is known for its "pioneer spirit." They want "doers."
3. The "Employability" Ranking Driver
You hit the nail on the head: European schools are obsessed with Salary Increase and Placement Rate because these carry the most weight in the Financial Times rankings.
Because of this, AdCom asks: "If I admit this person, can I place them at McKinsey, Goldman Sachs, or L’Oréal in 2 years?" * The Narrative: If your goals are "I want to explore business," you are a risk. If your goals are "I have 3 internships in VC and I want to join a Tier-1 firm in Paris/Singapore," you are an asset to their future ranking.
  • Work Experience: Even though MiMs are for "pre-experience" students, "pre-experience" at ESSEC usually means 2-3 high-quality internships. An applicant with a 720 GMAT but zero internships is often less attractive than a 660 GMAT with internships at blue-chip companies.
4. Is it Truly Holistic?
Yes, but with a caveat: Holistic does not mean "Average."
It means they are willing to trade a weakness in one area for an exceptional strength in another.
  • Low GMAT? You better have a "Blue Chip" internship or a successful startup.
  • Low GPA? Your GMAT needs to be 700+ to prove the GPA was due to lack of interest, not lack of ability.
  • Non-Business Background? They love architects, engineers, and philosophers, but you must explain why you need management skills now to achieve a specific goal.
Summary
You are right that fit and employability are the ultimate deciders, but the test scores act as the "entry ticket." Think of the GMAT/GPA as the ticket that gets you into the room, and your narrative/internships as the tools that actually win you the seat.


Show more