Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

It is currently 20 Jul 2019, 11:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 98
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2013, 11:35
7
16
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

64% (02:09) correct 36% (02:23) wrong based on 777 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics


When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as sources both of funding and of skills in marketing, management, and technical matters. It is unlikely that a single individual can both provide adequate funding and be skilled in marketing, management, and technical matters. Therefore, companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

(A) A new company is more likely to succeed if every founding member contributes equally to the company’s initial funding than if some members contribute more funds than others.

(B) Some founding members of successful companies can provide both funding and skills in marketing, management, or technical matters.

(C) New companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from nonfounders.

(D) Founders of a new company can more easily acquire marketing and management abilities than technical abilities.

(E) A new company is more likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills.

_________________
+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks :-)

"Pay attention to every detail"
Most Helpful Community Reply
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1003
Location: United States
Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2013, 02:16
12
cssk wrote:
When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as sources both of funding and of skills in marketing, management, and technical matters. It is unlikely that a single individual can both provide adequate funding and be skilled in marketing, management, and technical matters. Therefore, companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

A) A new company is more likely to succeed if every founding member contributes equally to the company’s initial funding than if some members contribute more funds than others.

B) Some founding members of successful companies can provide both funding and skills in marketing, management, or technical matters.

C) New companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from nonfounders.

D) Founders of a new company can more easily acquire marketing and management abilities than technical abilities.

E) A new company is more likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills.


Please explain your answers and start discussion :)


Nice defender assumption question. :)
First of all, when we see this kind of question, a correct answer is the one that could eliminate the weakness of a conclusion.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as sources both of funding and of skills in marketing, management, and technical matters.
Fact: It is unlikely that a single individual can both provide adequate funding and be skilled in marketing, management, and technical matters.
Conclusion: companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

Pre-thinking: what if a single founder who only has funding can hire non-founder members who have skills in marketing, management and technical matters? Clearly, a company can be successful. <==This is a weakness of the conclusion.

Assumption: The defender assumption should eliminate the weakness above.
Thus, the assumption should be “it is likely that a company founded by an individual, who often hires non-founder members having skills in business, is less successful than a company founded by group of founders.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

A) A new company is more likely to succeed if every founding member contributes equally to the company’s initial funding than if some members contribute more funds than others.
Wrong. The equal contribution does not help to bolster the conclusion. A can’t be an assumption.

B) Some founding members of successful companies can provide both funding and skills in marketing, management, or technical matters.
Wrong. B does not violate the conclusion. It’s true that some founding members can provide both funding and skills. But B does not help to elucidate why companies founded by groups are more likely to be successful than companies founded by individuals.

C) New companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from non-founders.
Correct. C clearly ELIMINATES the weakness of the conclusion. C is the correct defender assumption.

D) Founders of a new company can more easily acquire marketing and management abilities than technical abilities.
Wrong. Nothing to compare here. D is out scope.

E) A new company is more likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills.
Wrong. Same error as in D. The comparison between each founding members does not help at all. E is not relevant.

Hope it helps a bit.
_________________
Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2012
Posts: 17
Reviews Badge
Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2013, 16:52
I go with "E".

C and E are best contenders. In C it is saying about non founders which is not at all mentioned in the argument.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 98
Location: India
WE: Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Dec 2013, 00:48
schittuluri wrote:
I go with "E".
C and E are best contenders. In C it is saying about non founders which is not at all mentioned in the argument.

How can E be a contender?

Conculsion of the argument: companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

E says a new company is likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills. Negating this answer choice would in no way hurt the conclusion that is mainly concerned with the likelihood of the success of companies founded by groups.

In contrast, choice C says that new companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from nonfounders. Ah yes. Now this choice assures the success of new companies if their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management and technical abilities. Moreover, if you negate this choice, the conclusion definitely falls apart. Hence this is the best choice.

Do you agree?
_________________
+1 KUDOS is the best way to say thanks :-)

"Pay attention to every detail"
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 30 Aug 2017
Posts: 83
Location: Korea, Republic of
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V31
GPA: 3.68
Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2017, 19:21
pqhai wrote:
cssk wrote:
When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as sources both of funding and of skills in marketing, management, and technical matters. It is unlikely that a single individual can both provide adequate funding and be skilled in marketing, management, and technical matters. Therefore, companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument?

A) A new company is more likely to succeed if every founding member contributes equally to the company’s initial funding than if some members contribute more funds than others.

B) Some founding members of successful companies can provide both funding and skills in marketing, management, or technical matters.

C) New companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from nonfounders.

D) Founders of a new company can more easily acquire marketing and management abilities than technical abilities.

E) A new company is more likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills.


Please explain your answers and start discussion :)


Nice defender assumption question. :)
First of all, when we see this kind of question, a correct answer is the one that could eliminate the weakness of a conclusion.

ANALYZE THE STIMULUS:

Fact: When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as sources both of funding and of skills in marketing, management, and technical matters.
Fact: It is unlikely that a single individual can both provide adequate funding and be skilled in marketing, management, and technical matters.
Conclusion: companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.

Pre-thinking: what if a single founder who only has funding can hire non-founder members who have skills in marketing, management and technical matters? Clearly, a company can be successful. <==This is a weakness of the conclusion.

Assumption: The defender assumption should eliminate the weakness above.
Thus, the assumption should be “it is likely that a company founded by an individual, who often hires non-founder members having skills in business, is less successful than a company founded by group of founders.

ANALYZE EACH ANSWER:

A) A new company is more likely to succeed if every founding member contributes equally to the company’s initial funding than if some members contribute more funds than others.
Wrong. The equal contribution does not help to bolster the conclusion. A can’t be an assumption.

B) Some founding members of successful companies can provide both funding and skills in marketing, management, or technical matters.
Wrong. B does not violate the conclusion. It’s true that some founding members can provide both funding and skills. But B does not help to elucidate why companies founded by groups are more likely to be successful than companies founded by individuals.

C) New companies are more likely to succeed when their founders can provide adequate funding and skills in marketing, management, and technical abilities than when they must secure funding or skills from non-founders.
Correct. C clearly ELIMINATES the weakness of the conclusion. C is the correct defender assumption.

D) Founders of a new company can more easily acquire marketing and management abilities than technical abilities.
Wrong. Nothing to compare here. D is out scope.

E) A new company is more likely to succeed if its technical experts are also skilled in management and marketing than if they lack management or marketing skills.
Wrong. Same error as in D. The comparison between each founding members does not help at all. E is not relevant.

Hope it helps a bit.





It seems logical.
But argument is

companies founded by groups are more likely to succeed than companies founded by individuals.


Founded by groups / Founded by individuals


So (C) which is about non-founders seems irrelevant for me.


Please experts help.


mikemcgarry
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Mar 2017
Posts: 14
Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jan 2019, 13:16
Can an expert please give an explanation as to why the answer is C? Thanks!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as   [#permalink] 12 Jan 2019, 13:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

When a group of people starts a company, the founders usually serve as

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne