nygobjxiii
Here the sentence:
Caribou are wary animals with excellent hearing,
so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it with nothing but a handheld lance, as Dorset people did, required exceptional hunting skill.
I took:
so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it
The correct answer is:
so to stalk them over the treeless landscape and get close enough to kill one
I thought if someone is talking about a process, you have to use "ing". Could someone please explain it to me?
Your doubt is warranted. And though
lovikansal has made the right observation with respect to the S-V ambiguity. It is not the original doubt.
nygobjxiii your confusion is between
so to stalk them and
so stalking them. Which is basically a confusion between
an Infinitive as a Subject Vs
a Gerund as a Subject. And though we are normally accustomed to seeing Gerunds as Subjects in normal language (Eg,
Eating chocolates is my guilty pleasure), it is not the same with the Infinitives.
In your example provided, both
so to stalk and
so stalking along with their verb
"required" are correct. Other definitive errors between them help us differentiate the better choice.
You said, I quote, "if someone is talking about a process, you have to use "ing". This isn't necessarily true. Also, in the original question, there is no "process" being explained. It is just depicting an act, that is, to stalk Caribou.
If the usage of the infinitive as a subject caught you off-guard, then these examples might help:
To love is to live.
To tell the truth is always right.
To complain would seem ungrateful.
Hence, as a parting note:
Infinitives (to+verb) can act as subjects in some cases and exist with the proper verb to convey the intended meaning.