Official Explanation
2. It can be inferred that the author of the passage mentions predators (Highlighted) primarily in order to
Difficulty Level: 700
Explanation
Lines 7—11 (Second half of the whole passage) of the paragraph present the evidence against Martin’s hypothesis. Lines 11—13 present field test results showing that Martin’s hypothesis is incorrect, and the last sentence explains these results: the reason the increased phytoplankton resulting from the addition of iron do not reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide is that while the phytoplankton absorb carbon dioxide, the gas reenters the atmosphere when it is respired by phytoplankton predators. Therefore Choice A is correct: predators are mentioned to explain why Martin’s hypothesis is incorrect.
Choice B is not correct because while predators’ consumption of phytoplankton and respiration of carbon dioxide might be considered one indirect consequence of adding iron to iron-poor waters, identifying a consequence is not the primary function of the mention of predators.
Choice C is incorrect because the reference to predators is used to explain how carbon dioxide reappears as a gas, and Choice D is incorrect because no connection is suggested between predators and the distribution of phytoplankton.
Choice E is not correct because it is Martin who did not anticipate this factor, rather than the scientists who conducted the field tests.
Answer: A