Bunuel
When the nineteenth-century German bacteriologist Robert Koch identified a particular bacterium as responsible for cholera, Max von Pettenkoffer, a physician, expressed his skepticism by voluntarily drinking an entire bottle of the allegedly responsible bacteria. Although von Pettenkoffer took his failure to come down with the disease as a refutation of Koch's hypothesis that cholera was caused by bacteria, Koch argued that von Pettenkoffer had been protected by his own stomach acid. The acid secreted by the stomach, Koch explained, kills most ingested bacteria.
Which of the following, if true, provides the most evidence to support Koch's counterargument?
A. Peptic ulcers, often associated with excessive secretions of stomach acid, are common in certain areas characterized by low rates of cholera.
B. As von Pettenkoffer later admitted that he had previously had cholera, it is probable that he had developed antibodies that protected him from a second attack.
C. Cholera is endemic in areas in which poor sanitation results in high concentrations of cholera bacteria in drinking water.
D. Although stomach acid kills most ingested bacteria, large numbers of e. coli bacteria nonetheless manage to make their way to the lower intestine of the digestive tract.
E. Cholera bacteria ingested with bicarbonate of soda, a neutralizer of stomach acid, is more likely to result in cholera than if the bacteria is ingested alone.
In the nineteenth-century German bacteriologist
Robert Koch identified a particular bacterium as
responsible for cholera. Max von Pettenkoffer, a physician,
expressed his skepticism by voluntarily drinking an entire bottle of the allegedly responsible bacteria.
But, Max was not infected by this disease , hence used this as a refutation of Koch hypothesis that “
the identified bacterium is responsible for causing cholera “. Robert Koch countered the argument by mentioning the stomach acids of Max has killed the bacteria. The environment inside Max stomach is not conducive for bacterial Growth.
We need to find which options strengthens the counter argument provided by Robert Koch.
A. Peptic ulcers, often associated with excessive secretions of stomach acid, are common in certain areas characterized by low rates of cholera.
We are not interested in Peptic Ulcers. Max did not contract peptic ulcers. Hence out of scope.
B. As von Pettenkoffer later admitted that he had previously had cholera, it is probable that he had developed antibodies that protected him from a second attack.
This is an interesting trap answer. If your carried away with the flow of passage. This can be true that Max has acquired immunity for cholera because of his previous infection. Antibodies have been generated in larger amounts to prevent future infection. DOESNT STRENGHTEN.
C. Cholera is endemic in areas in which poor sanitation results in high concentrations of cholera bacteria in drinking water.
OUT OF SCOPE.
D. Although stomach acid kills most ingested bacteria, large numbers of e. coli bacteria nonetheless manage to make their way to the lower intestine of the digestive tract.
No where it’s mentioned that E. coli is responsible for cholera. Hence out of scope.
E.
Cholera bacteria ingested with bicarbonate of soda, a neutralizer of stomach acid, is more likely to result in cholera than if the bacteria is ingested alone.
This strengthens the counter argument of Robert that, the acids present inside the stomach are the main reason for the destruction of cholera causing bacteria in Max. Bicarbonate of soda which neutralises the stomach acid provides a fertile ground for bacterial growth.
Hence,
option E