Feel compelled to push back on the idea of taking notes for CR. To be honest, “push back” is mild. Not looking to make trouble, but taking notes on CR is a very bad idea.
Most folks know that LSAT LR and GMAT CR have strong similarities. No LSAT student in their right mind takes notes on LR passages. This is so for two reasons.
First, no one has time to take notes on CR/LR passages. But more importantly, no more than 50 people on the planet can accurately paraphrase CR/LR passages. People like myself know how to properly paraphrase a CR/LR passage, but that’s only because I’ve been teaching these beautiful tests since the 20th century.
CR/LR passages mean exactly what they say and say exactly what they mean. To change any of the wording at all entails changing the meaning of the passage.
That being said, most LSAT prep instruct students to take notes on RC. The same should be done for GMAT RC, but not for the reasons that most people might imagine.
The large majority of correct answers for RC reflect either a super basic idea from the passage or some kind of voice/opinion. This raises the question of how one is to extract these super basic ideas and voices/opinions. The key is to read RC passages more quickly than what most are comfortable with and taking notes at the same time.
Reading quickly and taking notes means the only notes that will be generated should be the basic ideas. Hopefully, one can include the voices/opinions, and then you’re good to go.
But please, for the love of Science, don’t take notes on CR.
Posted from my mobile device