This is a great question to test your understanding of LCM properties. The trick here is that the question asks which
CANNOT be the LCM, and you need to remember that x and y are
distinct positive integers. Let's work through this together.
Understanding What We Need:The LCM (least common multiple) of two numbers is the smallest positive number that both original numbers divide into evenly. Here's the key property you need to remember:
The LCM of any two positive integers must be greater than or equal to each of the original numbers.In other words: \(LCM(x,y) \geq x\) and \(LCM(x,y) \geq y\)
Let's Test Each Statement:Statement I: Can LCM = 1?Think about this: For the LCM to be 1, both x and y would need to be 1 (since 1 is the only positive integer whose LCM with itself is 1). But the question tells us x and y are
distinct positive integers, meaning \(x \neq y\). So this is
impossible. ✗
Statement II: Can LCM = xy?Let's try \(x = 3\) and \(y = 5\):
These are relatively prime (no common factors except 1)
\(LCM(3,5) = 15 = 3 \times 5 = xy\) ✓
This works! When two numbers share no common factors, their LCM equals their product.
Statement III: Can LCM = x - y?Here's where it gets interesting. Let's consider all possible cases:
- Case 1: If x > y
Then \(x - y\) is positive, but notice that \(x - y < x\)
This violates our fundamental property that \(LCM(x,y) \geq x\)
For example: If \(x = 7\) and \(y = 3\), then \(x - y = 4\)
But \(LCM(7,3) = 21\), not 4. We'd need the LCM to be 4, but 4 can't even be a multiple of 7!
- Case 2: If x < y
Then \(x - y\) is negative
But the LCM must be positive, so this is impossible.
- Case 3: If x = y
Wait, the question says x and y are distinct, so this case doesn't apply!
Therefore, \(x - y\) can
NEVER be the LCM. ✗
The Answer:Statements I and III cannot be the LCM, so the answer is
D (I and III).
The Key Insight: Notice how the fundamental constraint that \(LCM(x,y) \geq \text{max}(x,y)\) immediately eliminates \(x - y\) when \(x > y\), and the positivity requirement eliminates it when \(x < y\). The "distinct" constraint eliminates 1 and the \(x = y\) case.
Want to Master This Concept?You can check out the
complete step-by-step solution on Neuron by e-GMAT to understand the systematic framework for analyzing LCM problems and learn the common traps students fall into (like forgetting the "distinct" constraint or misreading "CANNOT be"). You can also explore other GMAT official questions with detailed solutions and process skill breakdowns on Neuron
here.
Hope this helps! Let me know if you have any questions.