ashmit99
amatya
While many of the dinosaur fossils found recently in northeast China seem to provide evidence of the kinship between dinosaurs and birds, the wealth of enigmatic fossils seem more likely at this stage that they will inflame debates over the origin of birds rather than settle them.
(A) seem more likely at this stage that they will inflame debates over the origin of birds rather than
(B) seem more likely that it will inflame debates over the origin of birds at this stage than
(C) seems more likely to inflame debates on the origin of birds at this stage rather than
(D) seems more likely at this stage to inflame debates over the origin of birds than to
(E) seems more likely that it will inflame debates on the origin of birds at this stage than to
Hello experts,
Do you think even if we replace "rather than" with "than" in A, B & C, there would still be a parallelism issue.
A'. the wealth of enigmatic fossils seems more likely at this stage that they will inflame debates over the origin of birds than settle them.
I know there are other issues such as pronoun issue and Subject-verb issue.
While there's limited value in considering hypothetical answer choices, I'd say the comparison would go from fundamentally wrong to less than ideal. The reason is that if we don't have a "to" it's difficult to see what actions are being compared, because the actions are so far apart.
Consider an example:
Tim put up a scarecrow in his backyard, more to entertain his kids than frighten any actual birds.
Here, it's pretty clear that a second "to" is implied before frighten. The verbs are so close together, that it's hard to imagine a reader getting confused.
But if the actions were farther apart:
Tim put up a scarecrow in his backyard, more to entertain his kids, who had recently watched the film Children of the Corn and hoped it was actually a documentary, than to frighten any birds.
This time, while I don't
need that second "to," I definitely want it there. Otherwise, it's tough to see what "frighten" is doing.
Similar deal in (A), (B), and (C), though those sentences aren't quite as complicated as my example. "More likely to inflame... than to settle," is just clearer than "More likely to inflame... than settle," though I wouldn't say that the latter is definitively WRONG, and I'd be way more comfortable relying on something more concrete to eliminate those options.
I hope that helps!
Thank you sir for the nice explanation.
I know very well that you put the example to make clear the whole things, but I need to know one important things in your own creative example!
is the connector, so we need to parallel the right and left part of the connector, right? In this example, ''who had
)''. The parallelism in verb is ok, but can we put clause like this one? Just a curiosity to know ....