|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
22 Jul 2007, 16:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 3
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
While most robot designers equipped their robots with "legs", more recent robot designers have opted for movable treads, which make continual contact with the ground over a wide area in contrast with specific spots on the ground
in contrast with
rather than at
as opposed to at
instead of
as against
in contrast with
rather than at
as opposed to at
instead of
as against
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
23 Jul 2007, 07:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
The contact of "legs" has to be contrasted with the contact of movable treads of robots, but options A,C,D & E illogically draw a contrast between wide area and specific spots. option B describes the describe the contrast in parallel terms.
My vote goes for B
My vote goes for B
23 Jul 2007, 07:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
in contrast with <-- incorrect comparison
rather than at <-- best choice
as opposed to at <-- 'to at' is incorrect
instead of <-- incorrect comparison
as against <-- incorrect comparison
rather than at <-- best choice
as opposed to at <-- 'to at' is incorrect
instead of <-- incorrect comparison
as against <-- incorrect comparison
