Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
25 Oct 2025, 07:27
Kudos
Bookmarks
Why Your Quant Score Is Stuck at 70th %ile — And It's Not Your Math
The difference between 70th and 90th percentile performance in GMAT Quant isn't about knowing more math—it's about solving the same problems 30 seconds faster per question. Today, we]re going to show you exactly how to transform those 3-minute struggles into confident 2-minute victories using strategic approaches that scale across problem types.
You've already mastered the quick wins in our previous session. Now we're ready to tackle the meat of the GMAT quantitative section: those moderate-complexity problems that can eat up your time if you don't approach them strategically. These are the questions that separate good test-takers from great ones.
Work Rate Without the Algebra Maze
Let me start with a problem that sends most students into an algebraic spiral. Here's an official GMAT question that looks complex but becomes remarkably manageable with the right approach:
Official GMAT Question: Alex and Jordan are each assigned to paint identical murals on separate blank walls. They both work at their own constant pace. Alex can complete his mural in t hours, while Jordan takes 3t hours to finish painting the same mural on his wall. If they start painting at the same time, how many hours will it take for Jordan to have thrice as much wall left to paint as Alex, in terms of t?
A. (1/4)t
B. (1/3)t
C. (1/2)t
D. (3/4)t
E. t
Before you dive into complex equations, take 10-15 seconds to think about the relationships here. Don't even touch your pen yet—just think about what's happening.
The Strategic Setup
When Alex finishes work in t hours and Jordan takes 3t hours, what's the fundamental relationship? Alex is three times faster than Jordan. This single insight transforms everything.
Let me show you our Work-Rate-Time (WRT) table approach:
For Jordan: Work = W, Rate = W/(3t), Time = 3t
For Alex: Work = W, Rate = W/t, Time = t
Now here's the key relationship: In any given time period, Alex completes three times as much work as Jordan. If they work for time 'x', and Alex completes work A while Jordan completes work J, then A = 3J.
Translating the Condition
The question asks when Jordan has "thrice as much wall left to paint." Let's translate this carefully:
Work left for Alex: W - A
Work left for Jordan: W - J
The condition: W - J = 3(W - A)
Substituting A = 3J into our condition: W - J = 3(W - 3J) = 3W - 9J
Simplifying: 2W = 8J, so J = W/4
Since Jordan's rate is W/(3t), and he completes W/4 work: W/4 = (W/3T) × t
Solving: t = 3t/4
Answer: D
Notice how we avoided setting up multiple variables and complex systems? That's the difference between a 3-minute struggle and a 2-minute strategic solve.
Probability Through Smart Visualization
Here's another official question that typically causes time pressure:
Official GMAT Question: What is the probability of randomly selecting two positive integers less than 7 such that their product is greater than 20?
A. 5/36
B. 1/6
C. 1/12
D. 1/9
E. 2/9
The Visualization Strategy
First, spend 5 seconds clarifying the constraints. Positive integers less than 7 means our range is 1 to 6. Not 1 to 7—this is a critical distinction that trips up many students.
Now, instead of listing all combinations, visualize this as a 6×6 grid. Total possibilities: 36.
For products greater than 20 (not greater than or equal to—another crucial detail), systematically identify favorable cases:
4×6 = 24 ✓
5×5 = 25 ✓
5×6 = 30 ✓
6×4 = 24 ✓
6×5 = 30 ✓
6×6 = 36 ✓
Notice that 4×5 = 20, which doesn't satisfy our "greater than 20" requirement.
Favorable cases: 6
Probability: 6/36 = 1/6
Answer: B
The key here isn't just getting the right answer—it's recognizing that a grid visualization beats systematic enumeration every time.
Range Analysis: The Ultimate Shortcut
Now for my favorite type of optimization. This official question looks like it requires three separate calculations, but watch what happens when we apply range analysis:
Official GMAT Question: Sarah wants to earn exactly $450 in interest in one year. She plans to invest in two accounts: one offering a simple annual interest rate of 1.1 percent and the other offering a simple annual interest rate of 2 percent. Which of the following could be the total amount of money that Sarah invests to achieve her goal?
I. 21498
II. 33750
III. 42930
A. None
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II
E. II and III
The Range Revolution
Here's where most students waste time: They set up equations for each value and solve three separate algebraic systems. Don't do that.
Instead, recognize this is a "could be" question. We need to find the possible range, not verify each value individually.
Find the boundaries:
Minimum investment (all at 2%): $450 ÷ 0.02 = $22,500
Maximum investment (all at 1.1%): $450 ÷ 0.011 = $40,909
Now simply check which values fall within this range:
I. 21,498: Below minimum—impossible
II. 33,750: Within range—possible
III. 42,930: Above maximum—impossible
Answer: B (II only)
That's it. What could have been a 4-minute calculation marathon becomes a 90-second strategic solve.
Building Your Speed Toolkit
Let me share the three principles that transform these moderate-complexity problems into manageable challenges:
1. Process Before Pencil
Take those 10-15 seconds to think before you write. Extract the information, identify the approach, then execute. This front-loaded thinking time saves minutes of wandering through wrong approaches.
2. Recognize Problem Patterns
Work rate problems? Think relationships, not algebra. Probability with constraints? Visualize, don't enumerate. "Could be" questions? Find ranges, don't calculate specifics.
3. Precision in Translation
Those 5 extra seconds ensuring you understand "less than" versus "less than or equal to," or "greater than" versus "greater than or equal to" prevent the most frustrating errors—the ones where you did everything right but answered the wrong question.
Your Next Level
You've now mastered the strategic approaches that handle 90% of GMAT quantitative questions efficiently. These aren't just time-savers—they're confidence builders. When you know you can handle these problems in 2 minutes, you approach the test with a completely different mindset.
But what about those truly challenging case study problems—the ones that genuinely require 3+ minutes of systematic analysis? In our final article, "Time Hog Taming," I'll show you exactly how to identify these questions quickly and decide strategically whether to engage or skip. You'll learn the complete case analysis system that transforms even the most complex problems into manageable chunks.
Remember: The path from good to great isn't about learning new concepts—it's about executing the concepts you know with surgical precision and strategic efficiency. Keep practicing these approaches, and watch your solving time drop while your accuracy climbs.
The difference between 70th and 90th percentile performance in GMAT Quant isn't about knowing more math—it's about solving the same problems 30 seconds faster per question. Today, we]re going to show you exactly how to transform those 3-minute struggles into confident 2-minute victories using strategic approaches that scale across problem types.
You've already mastered the quick wins in our previous session. Now we're ready to tackle the meat of the GMAT quantitative section: those moderate-complexity problems that can eat up your time if you don't approach them strategically. These are the questions that separate good test-takers from great ones.
Work Rate Without the Algebra Maze
Let me start with a problem that sends most students into an algebraic spiral. Here's an official GMAT question that looks complex but becomes remarkably manageable with the right approach:
Official GMAT Question: Alex and Jordan are each assigned to paint identical murals on separate blank walls. They both work at their own constant pace. Alex can complete his mural in t hours, while Jordan takes 3t hours to finish painting the same mural on his wall. If they start painting at the same time, how many hours will it take for Jordan to have thrice as much wall left to paint as Alex, in terms of t?
A. (1/4)t
B. (1/3)t
C. (1/2)t
D. (3/4)t
E. t
Before you dive into complex equations, take 10-15 seconds to think about the relationships here. Don't even touch your pen yet—just think about what's happening.
The Strategic Setup
When Alex finishes work in t hours and Jordan takes 3t hours, what's the fundamental relationship? Alex is three times faster than Jordan. This single insight transforms everything.
Let me show you our Work-Rate-Time (WRT) table approach:
For Jordan: Work = W, Rate = W/(3t), Time = 3t
For Alex: Work = W, Rate = W/t, Time = t
Now here's the key relationship: In any given time period, Alex completes three times as much work as Jordan. If they work for time 'x', and Alex completes work A while Jordan completes work J, then A = 3J.
Translating the Condition
The question asks when Jordan has "thrice as much wall left to paint." Let's translate this carefully:
Work left for Alex: W - A
Work left for Jordan: W - J
The condition: W - J = 3(W - A)
Substituting A = 3J into our condition: W - J = 3(W - 3J) = 3W - 9J
Simplifying: 2W = 8J, so J = W/4
Since Jordan's rate is W/(3t), and he completes W/4 work: W/4 = (W/3T) × t
Solving: t = 3t/4
Answer: D
Notice how we avoided setting up multiple variables and complex systems? That's the difference between a 3-minute struggle and a 2-minute strategic solve.
Probability Through Smart Visualization
Here's another official question that typically causes time pressure:
Official GMAT Question: What is the probability of randomly selecting two positive integers less than 7 such that their product is greater than 20?
A. 5/36
B. 1/6
C. 1/12
D. 1/9
E. 2/9
The Visualization Strategy
First, spend 5 seconds clarifying the constraints. Positive integers less than 7 means our range is 1 to 6. Not 1 to 7—this is a critical distinction that trips up many students.
Now, instead of listing all combinations, visualize this as a 6×6 grid. Total possibilities: 36.
For products greater than 20 (not greater than or equal to—another crucial detail), systematically identify favorable cases:
4×6 = 24 ✓
5×5 = 25 ✓
5×6 = 30 ✓
6×4 = 24 ✓
6×5 = 30 ✓
6×6 = 36 ✓
Notice that 4×5 = 20, which doesn't satisfy our "greater than 20" requirement.
Favorable cases: 6
Probability: 6/36 = 1/6
Answer: B
The key here isn't just getting the right answer—it's recognizing that a grid visualization beats systematic enumeration every time.
Range Analysis: The Ultimate Shortcut
Now for my favorite type of optimization. This official question looks like it requires three separate calculations, but watch what happens when we apply range analysis:
Official GMAT Question: Sarah wants to earn exactly $450 in interest in one year. She plans to invest in two accounts: one offering a simple annual interest rate of 1.1 percent and the other offering a simple annual interest rate of 2 percent. Which of the following could be the total amount of money that Sarah invests to achieve her goal?
I. 21498
II. 33750
III. 42930
A. None
B. II only
C. III only
D. I and II
E. II and III
The Range Revolution
Here's where most students waste time: They set up equations for each value and solve three separate algebraic systems. Don't do that.
Instead, recognize this is a "could be" question. We need to find the possible range, not verify each value individually.
Find the boundaries:
Minimum investment (all at 2%): $450 ÷ 0.02 = $22,500
Maximum investment (all at 1.1%): $450 ÷ 0.011 = $40,909
Now simply check which values fall within this range:
I. 21,498: Below minimum—impossible
II. 33,750: Within range—possible
III. 42,930: Above maximum—impossible
Answer: B (II only)
That's it. What could have been a 4-minute calculation marathon becomes a 90-second strategic solve.
Building Your Speed Toolkit
Let me share the three principles that transform these moderate-complexity problems into manageable challenges:
1. Process Before Pencil
Take those 10-15 seconds to think before you write. Extract the information, identify the approach, then execute. This front-loaded thinking time saves minutes of wandering through wrong approaches.
2. Recognize Problem Patterns
Work rate problems? Think relationships, not algebra. Probability with constraints? Visualize, don't enumerate. "Could be" questions? Find ranges, don't calculate specifics.
3. Precision in Translation
Those 5 extra seconds ensuring you understand "less than" versus "less than or equal to," or "greater than" versus "greater than or equal to" prevent the most frustrating errors—the ones where you did everything right but answered the wrong question.
Your Next Level
You've now mastered the strategic approaches that handle 90% of GMAT quantitative questions efficiently. These aren't just time-savers—they're confidence builders. When you know you can handle these problems in 2 minutes, you approach the test with a completely different mindset.
But what about those truly challenging case study problems—the ones that genuinely require 3+ minutes of systematic analysis? In our final article, "Time Hog Taming," I'll show you exactly how to identify these questions quickly and decide strategically whether to engage or skip. You'll learn the complete case analysis system that transforms even the most complex problems into manageable chunks.
Remember: The path from good to great isn't about learning new concepts—it's about executing the concepts you know with surgical precision and strategic efficiency. Keep practicing these approaches, and watch your solving time drop while your accuracy climbs.
Moderator:
