It is currently 22 Jun 2017, 07:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: want to get 720+in GMAT
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 56
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2011, 00:26
2
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

67% (01:42) correct 33% (00:54) wrong based on 1053 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Aim 720+

2 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3956
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2011, 01:29
2
This post received
KUDOS
The template of the idiom is ‘prohibit x from doing y’; Choice c is correct- ‘prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings’
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3956
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2011, 01:50
Because A is not ‘prohibit from’ but ‘prohibit to’
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Aug 2010
Posts: 107
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2011, 06:28
ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings


This is an example that tests correct idiomatic expressions.

Rule:
RIGHT: PROHIBITS X FROM Y
WRONG: PROHIBITS THAT
WRONG: PROHIBITS X TO Y

Using this rule, we can quickly eliminate A, B.
D & E can be eliminated because C is better and crisp. It has the correct idiomatic expression that the author is trying to use in his sentence structure.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: It's "Go" Time.......
Affiliations: N.C.C.
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 182
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Apr 2011, 07:53
Easy one got it within 30 seconds..

The correct idiom is "prohibit x from Y"
Only "C" uses the right idiom thus it is a correct choice...

ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

_________________

We are twice armed if we fight with faith.

He who knows when he can fight & when He can't will be victorious.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Feb 2011
Posts: 279
Concentration: General Management, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: HBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2011, 00:48
yes, it is prohibit from, ban on and forbid to..
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: want to get 720+in GMAT
Joined: 13 Mar 2011
Posts: 56
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2011, 23:16
MSDHONI wrote:
Easy one got it within 30 seconds..

The correct idiom is "prohibit x from Y"
Only "C" uses the right idiom thus it is a correct choice...

ravi67741 wrote:
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings


thanx dhoni....n hws ur prep goin on
_________________

Aim 720+

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Dec 2011, 12:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
18
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings



[Reveal] Spoiler:
isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?

_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

3 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Enjoying the MBA journey :)
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 137
Location: United States (DC)
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Dec 2011, 12:44
3
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Here's the explanation:

ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other.
Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.

Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.

Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.

Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.

Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.

Hope this helps!
_________________

MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University
McDonough School of Business

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: Do and Die!!
Joined: 15 Sep 2010
Posts: 326
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Dec 2011, 13:29
Thanks !!

i x out the first three, ....SCCCCCCC :rocket
_________________

I'm the Dumbest of All !!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 361
Location: US
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Dec 2011, 14:33
sudish wrote:
Here's the explanation:

ban and prohibit mean the same thing, but in this context, their usage is different and hence they complement each other.
Here, the sentence is actually trying to say that Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida and Minnesota do not accept leaves, brush and grass clippings in their landfills.

Option A uses an incorrect idiom. The correct idiom is 'prohibit ... from' and not 'prohibit ... to'. Hence incorrect.

Option B suffers from a similar error. 'Prohibiting that' is incorrect usage.

Options C is the clearest answer choice here. It correctly uses the idiom 'prohibiting ... from'. Hence this is the correct answer.

Options D and E are both incorrect because they do not have a clear meaning due to the usage of 'bans that'.

Hope this helps!


@sudish - why usage of 'bans that' is incorrect? Can you illustrate?
Cheers!
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

5 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Enjoying the MBA journey :)
Joined: 09 Sep 2011
Posts: 137
Location: United States (DC)
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE: Corporate Finance (Other)
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Dec 2011, 00:17
5
This post received
KUDOS
@Capricorn369:

Let's look at the first part of the sentence:
'Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans'
This part can stand on its own and hence it's an independent clause.

The next part of the sentence in options D and E are:
'leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills' and
'landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings'
Both these sentences are independent clauses as well and as such, can stand on their own.
The first part of the sentence does not require the second part to complete its meaning. Hence, the second part is non-essential and is therefore a non-restrictive clause.

Now, we know that we use 'that' only when the clause is restrictive. If the clause is non-restrictive, we use 'which' so that the clause acts as subordinate to the main clause.

Had the options D and E been of the form:
'prohibit landfills from accepting leaves, brush and grass clippings.'
they would have been correct because the latter part would have then acted as a restrictive clause required to complete the meaning of the main clause and could have been aptly joined to the main clause using 'that'.

Hope this is clear now!
_________________

MBA Candidate 2015 | Georgetown University
McDonough School of Business

2 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 884
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Dec 2011, 05:45
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) Same
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?


Nope, it is not redundant, " prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings" is the adjective phrase that help the meaning of "statewide bans" is clearer. The right idiom is "prohibit X from Y". Other choices seem awkward and wrong idiom. Choice D and E do not have clear meaning when use form "bans that"
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2011
Posts: 84
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Dec 2011, 05:18
Prohibit from is correct idiom.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 576
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2013, 10:43
Bumping for review and further discussion*.

*New project from GMAT Club!!! Check HERE


_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

1 KUDOS received
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1998
Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2013, 13:58
1
This post received
KUDOS
shrive555 wrote:
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) Same
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings



isn't Ban fallowed by prohibiting is redundant ?


Also, recall this example
The law PROHIBITS any citizen FROM VOTING twice (The law PROHIBITS any citizen TO VOTE twice/PROHIBITS THAT any person VOTE twice are both wrong)

According to my notes

Cheers!
J :)

Kudos rain!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2013
Posts: 83
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GMAT 1: 580 Q48 V21
GMAT 2: 530 Q49 V13
GMAT 3: 590 Q49 V21
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2013, 11:02
Prohibiting X from Y : correct idiom

+1 to me..
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 4
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Nov 2013, 21:50
When the sentence uses ban, doesn't the use of the word prohibit make it redundant?
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 962
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2013, 08:30
Meaning wise is it right to say "prohibiting landfills to accept" how come landfills can accept anything landfill is not a person or organisation.. usually we prohibit someone who obeys ... landfills can not obey orders.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos :)
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 893
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Premium Member
Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Apr 2014, 09:03
Experts,

Can anyone explain the reasoning behind the OE from VR2 why (D) and (E) are wrong?

(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills

OE:Bans that . . . cannot be accepted is not a correct idiom and does not make sense.

(E). that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

OE:Bans that . . . cannot accept is an incorrect idiom, and cannot following bans is illogical.

Can someone come up with the idioms starting with BANS?

Why cannot following BANS is illogical?

Rgds,
TGC!
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Re: Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to   [#permalink] 05 Apr 2014, 09:03

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ] 

    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 In the admissions process, universities have begun kalravaibhav 3 06 Aug 2015, 23:34
5 Experts publish their posts in the topic Financial institutions have begun demanding that analysts nehasingh1020 2 11 May 2014, 18:02
3 The ophthalmologists' offices have begun selling sajini 12 25 May 2017, 01:01
Q. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to ravi67741 0 30 May 2017, 00:28
27 Financial institutions have begun demanding that analysts feruz77 10 16 Oct 2016, 10:07
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.