It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 23:30

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Location: Los Angeles
With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 12:42
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

With a total population of less than two hundred and fewer breeding females than ever before, the American crocodile seemed a decade ago to be in danger of disappearing.

(A) of less than two hundred and fewer
(B) lower than two hundred and less
(C) lesser than two hundred and fewer
(D) fewer than two hundred and less
(E) of fewer than two hundred and of fewer

Less is used for items that you can't count, e.g., amount, whereas fewer is used for items that you can count, e.g., number. With this in mind, I'm going with the first choice.

I was teetering between whether population was or was not countable since a population is tied to a number. I finally came up with this - if you can say "one population, two population..." then the item is countable and "less" can be used. Since you obviously can't do that for population, it is considered not countable. On the contrary, you can say "one breeding female, two breeding female..." so breeding females is countable and "fewer" can be used.

Does this approach sound correct?

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1701

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 13:04
I would pick "A".
My reasoning is that population is noncountable so use less and breeding female is countable so use fewer.

-nakib
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2005
Posts: 331

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 13:20
Also A but for a different reason. Less than is a simple mathematical term. Fewer than implies a shift; fewer than a previous level. Not sure if that makes sense but A seems right to me.

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 313

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Location: Los Angeles

### Show Tags

08 Sep 2005, 16:04
OA is A.

Thanks for the input. At least I know my approach wasn't way off.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

08 Sep 2005, 16:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by